Search the Community

Hi, here is a shot I made of a lovely lady. A6500 Canon 85mm 1.2 @f1.4 (If memory serves) Metabones Speedbooster CameTv Boltzen 55w lights (x2) Diy Hand-painted Backdrop Thanks for looking!

Hello! A question haunting me: The Sony A7 Mk II offers 24mb resolution. I shoots birds and butterflies; even with a 400mm lens, very often I end up cropping the FF image to APS-C size or smaller; often I shoot in APS-C mode for 'perceived reach' that gets me a 10mb image file. How would that compare with using say the APS-C size Canon 80D (also 24mb)? Here I would have a non cropped 24mb file as compared with a similar Sony A7 cropped image which would be a 10mb file. Which would offer better image quality for making prints of size 20x30 inches? Thanks so much!

Hello there! My first post here is a long one, so I've made headlines hoping this will make it more clear and easier to navigate quickly. Background information: I like both photography and videography and I'm looking for a hybrid camera which does both really well and also has an ergonomic form factor. I currently own a Canon 40D which balances very well with my 70-200mm f4 IS lens and a full sized speedlight when I take pictures at conferences and events. The grip on the 40D is large and secure so I can easily hold on to this combination even when taking pictures in portrait orientation where the weight of the speedlight adds rotational force on the camera as it sticks out to the side. I need a full sized speedlight as I almost exclusively use bounce flash at conferences. I also own a Panasonic GH3 which form factor I like very much for video. I find the fully articulating touch screen a joy to use. I also use the GH3 at conferences with a 12-35mm zoom lens to compliment the 40D. However the GH3 does not balance very well with a full sized flash and the hotshoe also broke off after light use. I've had it repaired but now I use a TTL-cord to the speedlight, so I don't put too much weight on the hotshoe. My 40D is getting old and I'm hoping to upgrade. I've looked at the 80D which seems to be a very nice camera except it appears Canon has decided reserve high quality video to its cinema line of cameras. Therefore I've been looking at Sony's offerings which seem to do both photography and video at a very high level. Fuji also came to mind, but I'd prefer a system which has both APSC and full frame offerings. I'm aware of the A99II, but having Canon lenses I'm more attracted to the e-mount, as it allows me to use my existing lenses while trying out the Sony system. So far Sony's e-mount appears to cater to the current trend of miniaturizing cameras. I posted the below question in a videography oriented forum, and everyone who responded seemed to prefer smaller cameras. I guess my wish for a camera that also balances well with a full sized speedlight separates me from most video shooters. I think this forum is visited by people who are more or less interested in both photography and video. Therefore I'm curious to see what people here would answer to the below question, so please let your voice be heard and feel free to elaborate in the comments: Question: Would you be interested in a Sony a6500 and a Sony a7RII, a7SII in a Canon 80D form factor? Please note: I'm not advocating that Sony should increase the size of the a6xxx or a7x series. I'm wishing that they make a separate camera line with the same technology used in the a6xxx and a7x cameras, but in a larger DSLR-like form factor like the Canon 80D. Personally I really like the ergonomics of Canon DSLRs. However, I believe mirrorless cameras are the future, and Canon's offerings don't appeal to me. I also see the advantages of having small compact mirrorless cameras like the a6500. They are great for traveling light when used with pancake lenses, great for keeping a low profile, great for gimbal use etc. I would just like the same technology to be available in a larger more ergonomic body as well. I don't see why all mirrorless cameras per definition must be small. The definition of mirrorless, as I understand it, simply means an interchangeable lens camera without a mirror. Here are some of the main reasons, in no particular order, for me wanting a larger form factor à la the Canon 80D. 1) A larger grip makes using the camera more secure and comfortable when shooting for a prolonged time - especially for those with larger hands 2) Larger buttons and controls with a bit more space between them makes operation less "cramped" - again especially for those with larger hands 3) Better balance when using a large lens and a full sized speedlight on camera - important for those of us using large lenses and a lot of bounce flash 4) Room for a fully articulating touch screen 5) Room for a larger heatsink to further reduce the risk of overheating 6) Room for dual card slots 7) Room for a headphone port (already there on the a7-series) 8) Room for a larger battery 9) Perhaps room for a full sized HDMI port I understand that there are rumors about a larger more professional camera series above the a7 line, currently dubbed the a9. However, I'm "just" a hobbyist, and it would be very hard for me to justify spending 3500-5000 USD on a single camera. Therefore I really wish Sony would also make available cameras that both have a more ergonomic form factor and are in a price range accessible for enthusiasts. I think they would win over many DSLR-users, both professionals and enthusiasts like myself, if they did that. Sony has stated that they are committed to both the e-mount and a-mount, which makes me wonder if they've reserved the more ergonomic DSLR form factor for the a-mount. I hope not.

If you don't know Magic Lantern, it is basically an hack for Canon cameras that manages to exploit a ton more functions of which the cameras are hardware-capable but firmware-limited by the manufacturer. I've used it extensively on the Canon 5D mk II, and at the time it transformed a nice camera in a nearly perfect one. I think Sony should hire the hole lot of the guys behind Magic Lantern, or at the very least should take a page or two from their book. Specifically, features that Magic Lantern adds to Canon cameras and that I'd very much like to see in a future Sony camera (or in a firmware update...yeah, just kidding) are: Magic zoom A magnified view of the selected focus point that you can switch on and off just with an half-press of the shutter button. And yes, it works with legacy lenses as well! Cropmarks A simple bitmap mask, user selectable and user uploadable, that can show in the finder/lcd a different crop (16:9, square, etc.). Obviously shooting in RAW you will still have the ability to undo the crop, but it is extremely useful for compositional purposes. Bulb timer I think there should be a Sony app somewhere for this, but come on, the ability to go over 30s it should be built directly in firmware. With Magic Lantern you can select exposures up to a length of 8 hours! Remote Similar to the "Touchless shutter" Sony app that lets you wave your hand in front of the eye-sensor to start an exposure, with Magic Lantern you can trigger an exposure either: Optically: waving the hand in front of the eye sensor Audio: snapping your fingers; can be useful for shooting bullets piercing fruit Motion detection: this is awesome. The camera can be set to shot all by itself if it detects motion in the frame (or, alternatively, changes in the exposure levels). It works with legacy glass Trap focus: you focus where your subject should pass, and wait. When it will be in focus the camera will shoot all by itself. REALLY useful not just for sport, but even for street photography with MF lenses, given it works with legacy glass. With Magic Lantern all this options are even configurable, so you can fine tune the sensitivity to your specific needs. Stack focus Similar to the system implemented by Olympus in the E-M1, and working obviously only with AF lenses, this will automatically calculate how many frames you need for sharpness front to back and it will then shoot them. You will still need to join the pictures in the computer, but it removes human error from the equation. Auto exposure on zoom This is awesome. Independently from the kind of mode you're into (M, A, S, P) the camera will temporary switch to A when you zoom in to focus. This way even if you're using an f/stop of 16, or the focus point is aimed at a location that is quite dark compared to the rest of the well-exposed scene, the camera will amplify the signal and focusing becomes a breeze. Increase sharp contrast Similar to the "Auto exposure on zoom", this will pump contrast and sharpness to the max to facilitate focusing only when you zoom in to focus. I hope someone at Sony will listen...

Here is my Hands on with the Canon 85mm 1.8, i have tested it with 3 affordable adapters. Have a look why this is a great affordable lens but has its problems with autofocus on my adapters http://www.dsphotoblog.com/?p=957

Mostly for travel purposes (I sometimes travel by motorcycle), a general zoom, reasonably priced would be great. At the moment only the Sony-Zeiss FE 24-70 F4 is available. Rumors say a new lens is about to be released with a bigger aperture. Sounds great but if one looks at the corresponding A-mount lens it'll likely be (way) above the 2 000 EUR barrier. Wondering if anyone has tried the SIGMA or TAMRON 24-70 F2.8 together with an adapter. I actually have a Metabones to use my old (film-era) Canon/Sigma lenses, so I could use it and purchase the TAMRON 24-70 2.8 which gets good reviews (mounted on Canon...). How would it perform on Sony A7II? Anyone?

The new Techart adapter (M mount to E-mount) enables AF with Leitz lenses that do not have a built in focusing motor. The motor is in the adapter. As present adapters for e.g. Canon lenses do not allow AF with ALL lenses but only with a few newer ones, it may be a good idea to have the motor in the adapter instead of relying on the motor in the lens. Such an adapter would be a rather complex affair as the diaphragm would still have to be set by the camera body through the electrical contacts on the camera body and lens. But the system would not have to rely on a possibly not working focusing motor in the lens as that would be done by the adapter. Hopefully Techart, Metabones or whoever will take up this idea and construct an adapter which allows AF with all Canon/Nikon etc. lenses.

Finally finished my Review for the Canon 70-200 F4 L on the Sony A7II! Its packed full with images and a full 10 minutes Video Review covering adapters, autofocus test and more. So get some popcorn and beer and have a look Please subscribe to my youtube channel if you haven´t allready to be one of the first to know when there is a new video online! http://www.dsphotoblog.com/?p=736

I am researching the Canon TS-E 17mm f4 lens to use for architecture. I would be interested to get some feedback from anyone using this lens with either the Metabones or Sigma adapters on either an A7ii or A7Rii body. Are there any functional issues affecting manual focus particularly focus peaking and focus assist magnification? Is there any loss of sharpness? Does auto exposure work correctly? I would really appreciate hearing from people with first hand experience of using this lens with either of these adapters. Many thanks.

I think I just bricked my son's Canon lens! Today he bought a used Canon EF-S 10-18 STM for his Canon T4i, and it was working perfectly. I thought I'd compare its IQ to my EF-S 10-22 which I was using on my a6500 via Commlite adapter. (Terrible blurring in the corners, don't even try it on mirrorless — no such blurring on the Canon SLR.) So I put the 10-18 on my a6500, and it wouldn't even recognize the lens. F stop was reported as 00, and no autofocus. No manual focus either, because this lens is focus by wire. So I thought no biggie, and put it back on his T4i. But now it won't work on the Canon either — F 00, no focus, no red focus points, and when I try to click the shutter I get an error 01, communication error with lens. I tried all the tricks. Clean contacts, remove battery, re-mount lens, no joy. So I think this lens is ruined. Anyone else experience this? Is there a fix for it, or do I have to give him my 10-22 in compensation? Whelp, that's enough third party lenses for me.

So I recently picked up my new A7s II after using a Canon 7D for the past few years. I mostly shoot video (Ads, Music Vids and everything else) but I also do photography from time to time, mainly wedding and event photography. I have also purchased a Ef to E mount adapter to use a couple of canon ef mounted lenses I've bought in the past few years. The problem with using a cheap adapter is mainly that the auto focus sucks. So my question is, should I use my A7S II for both photo and video work and start buying more E mount lenses (for the auto focus) or should I just stick to my Canon 7D for my Photography work? I personally like the 7D's ease of use when it comes to photography as I'm so used to it by now.

Hello there, i am a new member of this forum. Just wondering if anyone can give me a suggestion. I tested my Sony a7ii with MF Canon FDn 500mm f/4.5 L lens, mounted on a CF tripod (Sirui N-2204), steady shot set at 500mm then shot on and off both mode, shutter speed around 1/800 to 1/1500 but can not get a sharp image. I even can see on the magnified LCD (without touching anything) the picture is not stable, kind of vibrating. Is it camera problem or Tripod? Please help me.Thank you.

Today I sold my trusty but ancient Canon 5DmkII. Well, it's not yet actually sold, but the first bid has been placed, so go it will, come Sunday! My last EOS lens went yesterday. I thought about keeping it, but the AF didn't work properly on my A7R (it was a 24-105 f4L, so you'd think it would go...) and there's no way I can afford an A7RII just yet. So my next little project is to compare my 3 50mm lenses - Canon FD 50mm f1.2, SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4, and a nice Helios 58mm f2. I'm particularly looking forward to see what the Canon can do - the adapter came in the post this morning

Ever since I had decided a while back that I was just going to shoot Fuji and Sony, I made the move to dump most of my Canon stuff (which was a pretty extensive collection). I successfully dumped about 12 lenses once I realized the A7R2 was the real deal and that it would work for me. Since then, I have bought the 28/2 and the 35/1.4 FE lenses. The 28 is compact, and renders nicely enough that it comes in very handy. The 35 was an inconsistent dog which was returned after a week of frustration (magical at the one thing it did well though which was centered subjects at close distances wide open). Since returning the 35, I have gone into a mode where I'm furiously looking for glass to put in front of this amazing sensor. I came to the point this morning where upon receiving my most recent purchase (Sigma 20mm 1.4 Art) that I have no completely bought back into a Canon glass system. I have since rebought (and resold) the 50L, rebought 85L2, Sigma 20mm and 50mm Art, and the Canon 200mm F2.0 IS all within the last two months. Adapting glass is not a perfect solution which is why I was hoping to buy into Sony completely. But seeing as my first experience with one of their expensive primes was complete shite, I was pushed back in the other direction to look for a fix for right meow. By my estimates, I've spent over 8k on Canon EF mount lenses recently while no longer owning a Canon EF mount body. This, to me is indicative of a major issue with Sony's ability to produce a line of impressive, consistent, and alluring lenses at comparable/acceptable prices. If they did have a solid line of lenses that I could trust, the cheese I just spent would all be in Sony's pocket already. I have owned a multitude of lenses in a multitude of different systems and the FE 35/1.4 was the first lens I've ever gotten that exhibited a blaring problem immediately upon mounting and shooting. This, combined with the subsequent reading I have done from lensrentals etc do not instill the confidence necessary for me to feel comfortable sending 1-3k to Sony for any lens right now. Go ahead and flame me if you want. But know that I would love for Sony to succeed and become a true contender as I have appreciated every bit of their innovation these past few years. Rant over. lol.

Hello everyone, I've just had an idea that we can collect the information of adapter performances on A7Rii and make a report like the table below, so everybody can take it as the reference. So basically we need the help of SAR readers owning A7Rii and a native camera body to estimate the performance of a non-native lens on A7Rii through an adapter. I can collect these information and calculate the average value to put into the below table and share to the public (Google drive sheet). This value doesn't need to be very accurate, though, since we can't standardize all the tests and the judgement is highly dependent on the testers, but it will give an ideal of how a specific lens works with a specific adapter. An estimated value without directly compare to the native body may be acceptable since there are people having only A7Rii. In this case I will use the notice column to mention that fact. How do you think about that idea? Should we start?

I'm the owner of some good Canon and legacy manual lenses, so my main purpose of using Sony A7ii is for adapting those lenses, especially the telephoto ones. With the IBIS, the telephoto lenses really shine and I don't have to replace them with much more expensve IS versions. In the case the EF 300mm f/4 L, the IS version is even not as sharp. I really love this lens, it's among the best lenses Canon ever made (beside the EF 200mm f/1.8 L that I also have), and while it's a 300mm lens, I still can manage to carry it for walking around (which I can't with the f/2.8 version). I use the Viltrox adapter and the autofocus sucks, but I don't need anyway since taking photos from distance allowed me to manually focus more slowly and carefully. Once the focus point is reached, it's really sharp, and very little CA was shown even at the most contrast part of the image. All the photos here I shot during my visit to Philadelphia and Washington. They were shot handholding at wide open all the time, and of course, with the help of IBIS. If you want to see better resolution, click to each photo to go to its Flick link. Thank you Sony, that's the whole new life for my lenses.

Has anyone else had trouble mounting FL lenses to the FD/FL adapters that are currently available? Any tips or tricks you have learned to get them to mount easier? I finally just got my 35/2.8 FL to mount yesterday and I am afraid to unmount it. Do folks buy multiple adapters and just leave them mounted to the adapters?

I’m impressed with the sharpness of the Tamron AF 70-300mm 4-5.6 Di SP VC USD (CANON EF) in combination with the Viltrox EF-NEX II adapter. There is also an Amount version available but I decided to go for the Canon version.Why? -Cheaper compared to the Amount + Sony LA-EA4 adapter 300 Euro lens, 95 Euro adapter -Build in stabilization on Canon EF version, the A-mount version of the Tamron does not have stabilization. (not a great issue when you have the A7 II) -Adapter is also Electronic and suited for full frame. Autofocus is terribly slow and certainly not usable for sport photography. This lens is for using with manual focus! I heard the LA-EA4 is also slow in combination with Amount lenses but I cannot compare. I get the best stabilization results choosing manual, 70mm on the Sony A7II. As you can see the picture of the woman at 130 mm is very sharp, look at the shadow of the hair on her forehead, sharp too! Certainly for a 300 Euro Full Frame lens! Full picture is taken at 130mm, F4.5, 1/3200, ISO 320 I recently bought the SEL24240 and I hope it is at sharp as the Tamron lens.

Is there any consensus out there as to what's the best Canon to e mount lens adapter that also provides aperture control? I'm OK with manual focus so poor autofocus isn't necessarily a deal breaker. My Fotasy adapter works great with my Olympus lenses that have an manual aperture ring but the lack of an electronic handshake keeps me stuck on maximum aperture for my Canon lenses. Thanks

That was the question on the front page today....Maybe I am out to lunch here but how can Canon be a threat when its using Sony's sensors, that to me shows that Canon has reached a limit to in its ability to inovate. The only threat I see is that unless Sony take up more effective advertising they will get lost in the mix because the money Canon save in development they will spend on more advertising which even now is an astronomical amount. We have to give Sony credit for the incredable efforts and influence they have had on the SLR world, as a converted Nikon user I have regained the excitement I used to have when packing up my equipment to go on a job, there are improvements to be made of course as any critic is quick to point out but at least the are working to improve on an the most exciting system out there.