Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'f4'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Sony Alpha Forum

  • News and General Discussions
    • Sony Alpha News & Rumors
    • General Discussions about Sony Alpha
  • Sony Alpha Full Frame
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Cameras
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Lenses
  • Sony Alpha APS-C / Sony NEX
    • Sony Alpha APS-C and NEX Cameras
    • Sony Alpha APS-C Lenses
  • Sony A-Mount
    • Sony A-Mount System
  • Sony Alpha Post Processing
    • Sony Alpha RAW Converting and Image Editing
  • Adapting Lenses
    • Legacy Lenses
    • Adapters & Speedboosters
    • Showcase Adapted Lenses
  • Showcase Sony Alpha Photos
    • People
    • Nature & Wildlife
    • Landscape & Travel
    • Architecture
    • Misc
  • Sony Alpha Video
    • Sony Alpha Video Discussion
    • Video Showcase
  • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • Newbie / Self Introduction

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 6 results

  1. The last 3 days i have been visiting a Street Artist Festival in Linz, Austria the "Pflasterspektakel" A perfect event to test my trusty Canon 70-200 F4 L again using the MC11 Adapter. Take a look at lots of images with these great street artists! http://www.dsphotoblog.com/?p=1945 ‪
  2. 24-70mm f4 Sony/Ziess owners. I just ran some lens tests on my 24-70mm F4. Overall, I'm happy. It's a good lens, not stellar, however, the color, contrast lack of color aberrations are all excellent, better than a lot of my Canon and Nikon short teles in those areas actually. It's decently sharp too. I tend to shoot primes for paying work. However, I wanted a decent, lightweight walk around lens and I think this could be it. I got it on Amazon Prime so I have a couple more days to decide. Here's my question: Do other owners find it to distort at f4 towards the sides (at any focal length)? Is this normal? At f4.5 it's almost gone at f5 the distortion is gone. To be honest, that's my only issue. If that's my only real issue did I get a decent copy? I can attach some lens test shots if you want. Thanks Scott
  3. Background: I do landscapes but I started out this inquiry to try and understand why my wildlife and portrait photos at F4 70mm on my 24/70 FE were often blurred, my wifes RX100 took a sharper shot so I used that to compare, Its been a little exhaustive doing all this pixel peeping etc. but I have learned a lot, the A7r is my first real DSLR after owning a NEX3, after shooting with it for 18 months now this investigating has helped me understand it and my lens strengths and limitations, I can condlude my investigation in this post. This post is a follow on from http://www.sonyalphaforum.com/topic/3691-rx100-sharper-than-24-70-fe-70mm/ I could not add more images to that post so started a new one. Findings: 1) As stated in the title, there is no doubt to me now that the Rx100 MK1 at its full focus range of 37mm (100mm equivelent in full frame) and max aperture of F4.9 is sharper than the 24/70FE at F4 70mm, and any F4 zoom range of the 24/70. The 24/70 is sharper at F8 and I know there are many benefits of the A7r image, color, pixel density etc, but its just not that sharp at F4. 2) The 16/35 FE is worse than the 24/70 at F4 at 24 and 35mm (not suprising as I dont believe any super wide angle lens should not outperform or match a 24-70) It was on par maybe very slightly less sharp at F8 at 24 and 35 than the 24/70. 3) I can rule out shutter shock as a cause as I have compared a 24/70FE 24mm at F4 and F8 below, I used a Hoya HD ND to get the same SS, F8 is tack sharp so the blur at F4 cant be caused by shutter shake. 4) My images at 70MM have been poor for a few reasons, in an attempt to prevent blur at 70mm shoooting portraits or wildlife encounters handheld I have done the following to increase shuttter speed to avoid blur, Shot at F4 Increased ISO Given the 24/70 at F4 is kinda blurry from a tripod the degradation from increased ISO above 600 was extreme, and at lower ISO (1-200) SS goes as low as 1/45 outdoors under cloud or in shade, then camera shake can make it blurry. So its basically pretty hard for me to do handheld portraits or wildlife shots on the fly unless I am in direct sun to bring the SS up without the help of ISO. Conclusion: Thats a little disappointing, maybe you pros out there are laughing at me as its obvious to you not to even try 70mm handheld with a slower F4 lens, but I had hoped I could do some basic stuff, truth is I should use my wifes RX100 for these kind of shots. This is not an attack on the 24/70, its great at F8 and I get the manyother benefits other than sharpness, just frustrating thinking i need anopther lens for handheld mid telephoto type shots. I have a few questions: Any suggestions? ( I now think I am better shooting 70mm at closer to F8, even if its way underexposed then recovering the image from raw, I will try that bit its hardly a goodsolution) Is this normal for this or similar full frame DSLR lenses at wide apertures? Does anyone still think my lens is a bad copy? I am thinking not as my 16/35FE is similar at F4 but please reply if you think so. One last test I hane not done is in full sun, F4 vs F8 at 70mm, same SS using an ND, The full sun speeding up the SS above 1/250 to rule in/out camera shake, but I believe I have done that anyway in these tests, and im over this. its hard work, so if anyone else wants to try with this with their 24/70 FE and post here be my guest. F8 1/4 ISO100 70mm (24/70 FE) crop 100% This is tack sharp, F4 1/4 ISO100 70mm (24/70 FE) Hoya HD Variable ND crop 100% Not as sharp as F8 at all, now I know this is not bad, but this is from a tripod, remote release, shooting handheld or with increased ISO seriously degrades images at 70mm F4 F4.9 1/2 ISO100 100mm RX100MK1 crop 100% Interesting the color change, both cameras are on standard creative style. BUt this is way sharper than the other F4 shots. F4 1/4 ISO100 24mm (16/35 FE) Cokin HD Variable ND crop 100% I have been curious which lens I am better shoooting at with between 24 and 35mm, My 24/70FE or my 16/35 FE, its clear the 24-70 is better but not by much.
  4. Finally finished my Review for the Canon 70-200 F4 L on the Sony A7II! Its packed full with images and a full 10 minutes Video Review covering adapters, autofocus test and more. So get some popcorn and beer and have a look Please subscribe to my youtube channel if you haven´t allready to be one of the first to know when there is a new video online! http://www.dsphotoblog.com/?p=736
  5. Sony SLT-A77V + Sigma Art 24-105mm f/4 Monument to the Conquerors of Space. Second highest among the monuments of the USSR/Russia. A 107-meter obelisk in the form of a rocket plume, with the supply of designer Sergei Korolev, lined with polished titanium plates. As well as many things made in the USSR, this rocket takes off high is a unique engineering design. Its authors are sculptor Andrey Faydysh-Krandievsky, architects Mikhail Barshch and Alexander Kolchin, as well as engineer Lev Shchipakin. On April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin becomes the first human being to travel into space. This spacecraft name Vostok 1. Chief engineer Sergei Pavlovich Korolev.
  6. Hi everybody, I have a Sony A7R and the other day I tried to shoot a timelapse with my 24-70 f4 (I normally use my Samyang 14mm) and I set everything manual. Buy after a while the lens went back to autofocus or something because some of the images turned out blurry (just some of them). Does anybody know why this could be and how to solve it?? I have tried to find a solution or a forum where this is discussed but I haven't found anything. Thank you very much in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...