Jump to content

Is there enough traffic on this forum to make it worth posting to?


Recommended Posts

I have posted to this forum a few times and have noticed that there is very little traffic and interaction on this forum.   So, either there are just very few people interested in Sony Alpha APS-C cameras, or they are not using this forum and are going somewhere else.  I wonder which one it is?

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PDGood said:

I'm not having much luck so far.

What kind of "luck" are you expecting?!!

In your first post, which was only 13 hours ago, you didn't bother to introduce yourself - you didn't even tell your name.

This forum has, in my personal view, a sore surplus of first-time posters who just pop in and ask questions which require actual effort of actual people to answer. This forum is not an automated, Sony related search engine. Many people don't even bother to say "thank you" for any effort expended on an answer that was given to them, even if it was a correct one.

If you don't like that, the only advice I can give you is: Be the change you want to see in the world! Become a contributor, instead of a "drainer". And eventually, over time, you'll be part of a real discussion. Including: receiving answers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a very busy forum but one with some active and experienced users willing to make an effort to provide as good an answer as they can to your questions. In the various threads you were involved in I can see people did the same for you Johnhoward28. If you don't like the speed or efficiency at which answers are provided, this is indeed not the place for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say: "Time heals all wounds".

And it's amusing to see, how the passing of less than a year papers over in some people's minds the reasons for why username got kicked out of this forum. I would have liked to link some of his "fresh perspectives", but they have been purged as well. SO SAD.  

SCNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see how people were offended by him and admittedly he was stretching it a bit every now and then, but honestly I found most of his posts amusing. People generally just failed to see the irony in them and took him too seriously.

I don't know what post tipped the bucket for him but I remember some of his last posts where he got in an argument with Jaf Photo, Jaf refusing to post some of his work as proof of being an experienced photographer. Jaf instead returned the question to username, who in turn posted 15 pages of his photo's. To me that was quite hilarious though many were annoyed by it.

Edited by Pieter
added anecdote
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 4/9/2019 at 10:11 PM, Chrissie said:

What kind of "luck" are you expecting?!!

In your first post, which was only 13 hours ago, you didn't bother to introduce yourself - you didn't even tell your name.

This forum has, in my personal view, a sore surplus of first-time posters who just pop in and ask questions which require actual effort of actual people to answer. This forum is not an automated, Sony related search engine. Many people don't even bother to say "thank you" for any effort expended on an answer that was given to them, even if it was a correct one.

If you don't like that, the only advice I can give you is: Be the change you want to see in the world! Become a contributor, instead of a "drainer". And eventually, over time, you'll be part of a real discussion. Including: receiving answers.

I understand and you are right.  I always answer questions and try to be helpful if I believe I know enough to comment, I just generally don't.  Unlike some other people who are an expert in everything and always have something to say, whether useful or not, I like to not be like that and only answer questions, I KNOW I can answer with a good degree of confidence that I will be helpful.  So, I don't say much, but when I do, it is usually worth something. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...