Jump to content

Dear Sony, Please make a point and shoot with the a6000 s...

Recommended Posts

 Dear Sony,

Please make a point and shoot with the a6000 sensor.  I want a true pocket size camera. 

I like the a6000 sensor better than any of the other cameras in the 6000 series, and better than the zv-1's.  I love that image.

Give the microphone from the zv-e1, a gain control, a builtin lens that looks like the 16-50 oss kit lens, and a flip out screen. 

That would be so awesome.  I would like to buy that please.




Link to post
Share on other sites

How is the a6000 sensor nicer than any other camera in the a6xxx range? As far as I know they're all pretty identical up to the a6600. It's more the color settings than the sensor that makes a difference, unless you refer to filming at 1080p.

Did you have a look at the Ricoh GR III?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to say "better" because this is a subjective thing. 

When I look at video samples of the a6000 compared to its siblings in the 6x00 series, I like the image on the a6000 better.  I'm not sure if it is the colors or color contrast that I like better, or what it is.  (This video is a zv-e10, the effect is similar.)


With the 4k zv-1 series, to me (again this is subjective), it seems like human faces look artificially rounded.  They don't have the definition and clarity that the a6000 has.


Per your suggestion, I looked at some reviews of the Ricoh.  It looks like a mostly stills camera?  I would like something that does video for vlogging.  (I probably should have mentioned the vlogging in the OP, sorry.) 

I was hoping that the tech has advanced far enough that the a6000 sensor could be put into a pocket size point and shoot for vlogging.  I don't know if Sony would feel it is worth pursuing, but it is something I would like to buy.







Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yea I didn't get that part that you wanted a video cam. Regarding the A6000 versus later models: the A6000 does shoot better 1080p footage. If I remember correctly, the A6000 downsamples full sensor footage to 1080p whereas the later cameras that can record 4k do pixel binned 1080p. As a result, the A6000 footage looks more crisp and detailed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • I mostly see posterization artifacts, which are the result of lossy compressed RAW files (or bad jpeg conversion). Unfortunately, the A6400 doesn't offer uncompressed or lossless compressed RAW. The noise might indeed result from the smaller sensor than what you're used to. If you're not shooting at max aperture, you could try shooting at wider aperture and lower ISO. When you're not shooting at max aperture, fullframe versus APS-C shouldn't matter much in terms of ISO-performance combined with depth of field: at the same ISO and aperture value, fullframe offers better noise performance but with a narrower depth of field. This can be offset by choosing a larger aperture and lower ISO on the APS-C camera. If you want a fullframe camera the size of an A6400, try the A7C(ii).
    • ..unfortunately, the lighting was correct. The shot required deeper shadows. The K1 ff didnt have these banding issues [yes, I know the sensor is larger]. The film shots had details in the same light. The sony files, both the jpg and raw, had this banding/noise - with NO retouch or post adjustments [straight out of the camera]. the camera was purchased new a few years ago and I am trying to determine if there is something wrong, or the settings are wrong, or the camera just cant handle this kind of lighting [studio + softbox]. No shadow detail is one thing... banding/noise in the shadows is unacceptable. Does sony have a body this size that is FF ? Im wondering if that would make a difference..  dw
    • The root causes for banding are uneven lighting, incorrect exposure settings, or compression artefacts or certain kinds of artificial lighting, especially LED lights. Also the lens used plays a role, I have noticed it more with my sharpest lenses, looks like they outresolve the sensor when I have a uniform blue sky. There is more than one solution, and ultimately post-processing, but the root cause has to be identified first.
  • Topics

  • Create New...