Jump to content

Sony A7s: Is my sensor flawed?


Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

Came to the forums seeking some help. I bought my A7s used for a good deal a couple months ago and it's been great. I normally just used it in ideal lighting conditions but felt like testing out it's use in low light since that's one of it's strongest selling points. Unfortunately, the levels of noise I'm getting in the blacks and shadows is completely unusuable and totally different then others who have posted their noise tests online (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guXnEVou6Lc for example).


Here is some footage I just shot static on my porch. Not a particularly bright night at all mind you.

 

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B9eK_xmGZsW3Nnl4eU5mank2TDg&usp=sharing

 

PP: Cine2 (S-Log was giving me even more noise)
Color: Cinema
Lens: Rokinon 35mm @ 2.0

24fps, 1/50 shutter. X AVCS codec

C0001: ISO 3200

C0002: ISO: 40000
C0003: ISO 80000
C0004: ISO 160000

 

I'm wondering if I could possibly have a sensor issue on my hand and could use input. Thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Peter Kelly

To be honest, I'm not a video aficionado so my opinion is not definitive by any means, but I see two issues here that aren't sensor related.

 

The first is that the quality seems most adversely affected by compression more than noise, which makes any value judgement difficult.

Your clips seem to look like old Youtube videos taken on smartphones! I don't know whether this is the settings you've used, or some conversion happening during upload, but I'd suggest you check that first.

 

The second part relates to just how dark is the scene. No matter how good the camera, darkness encourages noise. It is simply about having sufficient light. I think that you say S-log was giving more noise points to the very low light being an issue.

 

You can take shots and video at higher ISO which will be very clean as long as they have enough light; it is when you hope that simply having high sensitivity will make up for a total lack of light that you will be disappointed.

It's a case of balancing results against expectations and it can be tricky to judge from what we see on the internet as to the precise original conditions and how they compare. For instance, the Youtube link you gave does not give a measurement of 'Lux', so who knows exactly how dark it was?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No your A7s Sensor is not flawed!

 

It is the rest of the Camera that is flawed.

The A7sII did not solve my problems, but

the 7Q+ recorder when DownRes 4k to 1080P30 helped a lot.

So did the $2500 28-135 Cine lens.

 

I routinely take indoor videos in poor/low light at ISO 6400-12800

There is always some noise in the shadows if you care to pixel peep.

The Cinema guys think that makes the Video more film grain like.

 

Then of course the user is also flawed and we have to learn how to use the A7s properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...