Jump to content

Suitability of the Sony SEL200600G Lens for Astrophotography


joerg
 Share

Recommended Posts

A year ago now, I started using my super telephoto zoom lens, originally purchased for wildlife photography, for astrophotography. Here I would like to share my experiences, but also go into some limitations that the Sony lens has in my opinion.

In the first section, I will report on my experience using the SEL200600G lens in combination with a Sony SEL20TC 2xteleconverter and a Sony A6000 APS-C camera on a simple aluminum tripod. Although the construction is rather shaky and finding the objects and also focusing is difficult, exposure times up to about 1/8s (@ 1800mm focal length 35mm equivalent) can be achieved and so some bright objects of our solar system can be photographed.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Lunar photography

To photograph the moon with its apparent diameter of about 30' format-filling the setup is almost ideal, the moon fills about 75% of the horizontal image area. Also the sharpness is sufficient to see some nice details.

Moon, 10.8 days old, F13 ISO-100 1/60s

Crop of the so called golden handle

 

Solar photography

Since the sun has almost the same apparent diameter as the moon, the same applies to solar photography as just mentioned, except that a suitable solar filter (in my case a Baader 5.0) must be used!

Sun with several sun spots, F19 ISO-800 1/1500s

 

Planetary photography

Bright planets can also be photographed with this equipment. However, the lens with its 95mm diameter is not fast enough and the achievable focal length of 1800mm is not long enough to see details.

Jupiter, F13 1/30s ISO-100

Saturn, F13 1/15s ISO-400

Venus 270 days old, F13 ISO-400 1/1000s

 

Edited by joerg
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the second section I would like to discuss the possibility of photographing deep sky objects.

To achieve exposure times of a few seconds the earth's rotation has to be compensated, in my case by the equatorial mount CEM25P from iOptron. With the possibility of autoguiding, here by the MGEN3 from Lacerta in combination with a 50mm finder scope, exposure times of several minutes can be achieved. Seemingly small things are also important in my opinion, like a heating tape to avoid humidity condensation and the use of a dummy battery adapter to be able to run the camera constantly for several hours.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Emission and reflection nebulae

With the possibility to select the focal length almost arbitrarily between 200 and 1800mm, very many objects can be photographed with the SEL200600G. For emission nebulae with a primary emission at hydrogen-alpha and 656nm the use of an astromodified camera is recommended (replacement of the IR cut filter by clear glass). In my case I took a Sony A7R bought used at E-Bay and let it astromodify.

Orion nebula M42 Composit 10x10s and 30x180s ISO-800 F6.3 600mm 7xDarks 15xFlats 15xBias Optolong L-Pro Filter

Plejades M45 28x120s ISO-800 F6.3 600mm 5xDarks 26xFlats 20xBias

 

Galaxies

The same applies analogously to galaxies as to planetary photography. It is possible to photograph single galaxies. However, the optic is not fast and not long-wavelength enough for very detailed images.

Markajan chain 102x240s ISO-800 600mm F6.3 6xDarks 15xFlats 15xBias

M51 110x120s ISO-1600 1200mm F13 7xDarks 15xFlats 15xBias

Edited by joerg
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2021 at 9:54 AM, joerg said:

A year ago now, I started using my super telephoto zoom lens, originally purchased for wildlife photography, for astrophotography. Here I would like to share my experiences, but also go into some limitations that the Sony lens has in my opinion.

In the first section, I will report on my experience using the SEL200600G lens in combination with a Sony SEL20TC 2xteleconverter and a Sony A6000 APS-C camera on a simple aluminum tripod. Although the construction is rather shaky and finding the objects and also focusing is difficult, exposure times up to about 1/8s (@ 1800mm focal length 35mm equivalent) can be achieved and so some bright objects of our solar system can be photographed.

 

Lunar photography

To photograph the moon with its apparent diameter of about 30' format-filling the setup is almost ideal, the moon fills about 75% of the horizontal image area. Also the sharpness is sufficient to see some nice details.

Moon, 10.8 days old, F13 ISO-100 1/60s

Crop of the so called golden handle

 

Solar photography

Since the sun has almost the same apparent diameter as the moon, the same applies to solar photography as just mentioned, except that a suitable solar filter (in my case a Baader 5.0) must be used!

Sun with several sun spots, F19 ISO-800 1/1500s

 

Planetary photography

Bright planets can also be photographed with this equipment. However, the lens with its 95mm diameter is not fast enough and the achievable focal length of 1800mm is not long enough to see details.

Jupiter, F13 1/30s ISO-100

Saturn, F13 1/15s ISO-400

Venus 270 days old, F13 ISO-400 1/1000s

 

Thank you so much for sharing this interesting post, and especially for the great images you took and showed us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my backyard (officially Bortle class 4, but I guess it is worse).

The nearest streetlight is only about 10 metres away. I just gave it an extra cardboard lampshade so that it doesn't shine fully into my optics. ?

Fortunately, there was almost no gradient in the shots. You can live very well with homogeneous background lighting in post-processing, but I can't cope with gradients at all... ?

Edited by joerg
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this Joerg. Very interesting. Astro is not something that I've tried but I do have a 150-600mm and a 2x teleconverter in my camera bag and so you have got me thinking that I might do some experimenting.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Taking a cue from "Lucky Imaging", I have reworked my approach to photographing bright celestial objects (namely the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars and Venus) with my Sony equipment:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Jupiter Sony A7R iii 100x1/60s ISO-400 1200mm F13

Hardware used:

- Sony A7R iii (full frame camera)

- Sony SEL200600G (SEL 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 E-mount telephoto zoom lens)

- Sony SEL20TC (2x teleconverter)

- Sony RMT-P1BT Bluetooth remote control unit

- Sturdy tripod

- Bahtinov mask

Software used (all freeware):

- PIPP

- AutoStakkert 3

- RegiStax 6

Take pictures:

- Centre object in frame (helpful to zoom to 200mm first and find the object, then move to 600mm).

- Focus using the Bahtinov mask (alternatively, focus manually using the focus magnifier)

- Take approx. 100-700 pictures in continuous shooting mode (high speed) (manual mode with exposure time much shorter than 1/10s)

Post-process the images:

- Convert the RAW images into an AVI film in PIPP

- Stack the images in AutoStakkert

- Sharpen in RegiStax

- Further post-processing, e.g. in Adobe Photoshop, is possible, but not really necessary.

For those interested, the workflow in PIPP:

- Open RAW images in the Source Files tab, pre-select "Planetary"" for all planets (not moon!) (object must contain 25 pixels, image will be cropped to 448x448 pixels),

- Output Options - here you can set the data format and the output directory, but it should fit (AVI into the same directory as the RAWs).

- Do Processing - Start Processing

in AutoStakkert:

- Open generated AVI file ( 1) Open)

- Image Stabilization - "Planet (COG)" and "Dynamic Background" remain activated.

- Select the size of the alignment points (e.g. 24 or 48, rather not more than 100) and create a grid with "Place AP Grid", approx. 20-50 blue frames should be created in the analysis image.

- 2) Analysis - a "Quality graph" (grey graph of single images, sorted in green descending order) is generated.

- Use the green slider to select a limit (e.g. the best 10%, 20% or 35%). Then enter this in the first field on the left at "Frame Percentage to Stack".

- The other 4 options can be/remain activated.

- 3) Stack

 and in RegiStax:

- Open stacked image

- Possibly more contrast and less brightness, if there are bright areas without inner structure you have overdone it.

- Sharpen - the sliders sharpen larger and larger details from top to bottom. Pull them to the right in this order. This creates artefacts, which can be removed by increasing the

- denoise (whereby the denoise box above the first sharpness control with e.g. 0.4 is often sufficient).

- The goal is an image with many clearly defined details without traces of noise or grain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • Hello ! A friend gave me an old Sony SLT A65 that was locked in a suitcase for some years and guess what... It was pretty dirty. The translucent mirror looks strange. I know it's a pellicle mirror, but something is really weird , at least to me who never saw this entity before. It shows a rainbow pattern when lit, like a diffraction grid. And when I point the camera to a strong light source, let´s say streets lights or car lights, a huge halo and a diffuse pattern appears, almost like one of that photographic filters from the '70s. I guess the mirror is damaged. Does enyone have any experience with this ? I managed to remove the mirror and carefully rinse it with water and detergent solution , rinse again and dry, but the rainbow patter persists. My question is basically about the translucent mirror behavior with strong highlights and if the rainbow pattern on its surface is normal.   Thanks!  
    • Sounds like you need a manual, and you are correct different settings can affect what you can do in the drive more.  Did you simple press the DRIVE button and select the THREE rectangles? There are several "burst" modes -- that you set with the Fn button or DRIVE button.  One takes several photos, when you press the button once (CONTINUOUS).  Another requires you to press the shutter button each time (SINGLE).  When you press the DRIVE button, what icon shows up -- a single rectangle or three?
    • If the 18-105 is too bulky, then so is the Tamron 17-70. Quality wise however, definately pick the Tamron over the Sony Zeiss 16-70, which is a compromised and dated design and similar in quality to the 18-105. I was in the same boat as you for a while (also had the 16-50 kit lens and 18-105 f/4), and went with the Sony 16-55 F/2.8 G. Happy with the choice as it's more compact than the Tamron 17-70 and vastly better quality than the Zony 16-70. In your case however, the omission of stabilized optics might be a dealbreaker. Did you consider the tiny but decent Sigma 18-50 f/2.8?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...