Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

I finally made the jump from Nikon D810 to the fantastic A7RIII and couldn't be happier with my decision. 

I want to place a glass screen protector, but it seems to me that the camera already has a plastic protector installed.

Is what I am seeing an actual plastic screen protector or is that how the screen looks with a slight sharp lip (not sure if it comes across in the attached image)?

I'm asking to know if I should peal that off or if it's part of the screen and install the glass protector over it.

Thank you 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, keepcoding said:

 

So yes, there is already a screen protector on the LCD.

But it is still better to add an additional protector while the screen is still scratch free.

Got it, thank you for your reply. I'll just install it over that one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

than

22 minutes ago, Lescatalpas said:

No, don't try to peel! You need to buy a protector. I have had a cheapo, but now a sony protector, which adheres better and feels a little thicker. 

Thanks for your reply, I'll install it over the plastic one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a little confusing,

neongraph: Is what I am seeing an actual plastic screen protector?

Lescatalpas: No, don't try to peel!

keepdocing: [video showing the original plastic sheet protector that can be replaced with nice results]
keepdocing: But it is still better to add an additional protector while the screen is still scratch free.

Q1: The video is of a 7RM2 but the question is about a 7RM3. Is this the cause of confusion?

Q2: My 7RM3 has a scratched screen, which I'd like to fix. Should I proceed as in the video or as Lescatalpas suggests, which would preserve the scratches in the current protector under a second protector?

(What looks like a plastic sheet on my screen isn't on quite straight.)

Edited by thefsb
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Once the anti-reflection coating has been rubbed off, putting an additional protector on top of it won't help much. You'll have to replace the cover, which is not a home fix or anything you should try while the warranty is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...