Jump to content

A6000, salt water, badluck, & hope


Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to this forum. Last week while shooting in beach my A6000 got a splash, drowned for a second, I felt so stupid that it took two minutes to remove battery and card. Got back to hotel, dried with hair dryer, kept in silica gel box for 5 days. I checked and am pretty sure that that body got soaked though the sensor was dry.

yesterday I switched it on and the lens retracted back, screen was working and after few seconds the screen got white... No response from the lens and camera... These happened Everytime I tried in next 2 hours... Kept again in box...

 

Now my questions are...

Is there any hope?

If yes, should I get rid of it as soon as it gets functional?

Or I may have a year or two life left for this body(mostly use as secondary body)?

 

Thanks

 

Sent from my Redmi 3S using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Would you actively search out a camera 'drowned' in water, be it fresh or salt, and buy it? If so go ahead for the next 'year or two' and take it with you every shoot. Maybe it will work. Maybe it won't. Imagine the elation when it fires up. (Or the disappointment when it doesn't)

 

You now have the Sony A6000 brick model and don't stick someone else with your problem if your plan to "...get rid of it as soon as it gets functional" means you plan to sell it off.

 

New A6000s are cheap these days. Used ones (and that's what you were using) even more so. Electronics don't heal themselves on their own. If you're merely a pedestrian / casual photographer then nothing's lost if it's unreliable at times. But if using it is your paycheck, I'd toss it as quickly as I would a parachute that sometimes opened, sometimes not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

........ my A6000 got a splash, drowned for a second, ......

body got soaked though the sensor was dry.........

............ Is there any hope?

 

       

Stoooopid question.  

      

  

Never the less, advice:   

   

Put it in your sock drawer, for use ONLY when 

a relative asks you to shoot a wedding or any 

large important event.   

      

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Salt water is tricky because when it dries it leaves a residue that can short circuit electronics.

 

Prices have dropped on A6000 so new ones sell at the same price as used ones did until recently. So, It's a good time to buy a replacement. If you sell your camera, sell it for parts with full disclosure. Bad luck is no reason to cheat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...