Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello.  I am an avid motorsport fan.  Each year, I attend the Indy 500 and a couple other motorsport races.    Long story short, I need a lens capable of capturing fast moving objects at a distance.  I am an amateur with a limited knowledge base.  My camera is an A6000.  For telephoto stuff, I am currently using the Sony 4.5-6.3/55-210.  But, I am curious what my options are for reaching out farther, even to 300mm or beyond.  

 

As I will only likely use a new telephoto a few times a year, I am fairly budget conscious and would ideally like to keep the lens below $600 to $700.

 

Does anyone out there have experience with motorsport photography that could given me a few pointers as to what budget-minded lenses I should consider...if any at all?  

 

Perhaps I am asking too much of lens at this price range, but I would sure love something that got a little closer to the action on race-day.  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Budget minded telephoto longer than the cheapo 55-210?  Haha, you bought the wrong system.  If you would have gone Canon you could have gotten the EF USM 70-300 IS for approx. just a wee bit more than what that 55-210 sells for and that would give you 50% more reach.  Or if your budget is a bit more liberal you can get the Sigma 150-600 for about a grand give or take depending on your area and currency (don't believe the adapter hype - fast action and adapters are not your friend).

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, I didn’t buy the camera. It was a gift from my folks. Second, I clarified that I am *barely* an amateur photographer, hence the cheap budget. Third, can-you came off as a real jerk above.

 

Anyone with useful advice? It’s people like this that have turned me off fo the photo community. “Not going to spend $3k? Go f yourself” advice isn’t helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would look out for used FullFrame lenses, the focal length will be 1.5x bigger on the APS-C sensor,

 

FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS SEL70300G might be worth a look if you can find a good used one. On your α6000 this would have an equivalent focal length of 105-450 mm though you will need a bright sunny day due to the small aperture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my Sony 70-200 f4 for $700 used on Craiglist.  It is a fabulous lens, better than my Canon equivalent which I sold.  Razor sharp, stabilized, and relatively lightweight.  It worked perfectly on my A6000.  I would give it serious consideration.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
    • I would try resetting the camera. I can’t really think of anything else you can do other than try a different card.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...