Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know this isn't an Alpha or NEX body but its still E Mount.

Write up - Some old summer elite footage that I never had any intention of posting, I shot this game a few weeks after I bought an FS5 from a friend. Everything is 240fps with the end trigger function.

Picture profile if I remember correctly was HLG 2, Rec 709 exposed at 80 Ire. Lens was the Sony 70 - 300mm FE G lens.

Definitely hoping the A7siii has some sort of start trigger/end trigger cache function. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
5 hours ago, VTC said:

Had to mute the 'porn' music. I never find myself muting actual (or simulated) field game audio. (If the viewer mutes the audio... it's scored wrong.)

Ok boomer. ?

Sweet ophelia by Zella day (Gold Fields remix) is a classic summer track.

Edited by MakoSports
unfinished
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2020 at 7:52 AM, MakoSports said:

I know this isn't an Alpha or NEX body but its still E Mount.

Write up - Some old summer elite footage that I never had any intention of posting, I shot this game a few weeks after I bought an FS5 from a friend. Everything is 240fps with the end trigger function.

Picture profile if I remember correctly was HLG 2, Rec 709 exposed at 80 Ire. Lens was the Sony 70 - 300mm FE G lens.

Definitely hoping the A7siii has some sort of start trigger/end trigger cache function. 

Hi! The quality is just great! Is this recording in 1080p to SD and after upscale to 4K ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, I have a Sony a6000 bought second hand. It's working fine but the photo capture from video function in the playback menu is missing. I've updated the firmware to 3.21 from 1.00 but the option is still missing. I can now shoot in XAVCS but would like to grab still images from the video. Anyone please?
    • The 200-600 is heavy. If you're not used to the weight, it can be daunting over a period of time. Since the lenses are the same in speed, you aren't gaining any low-light performance. But as Pieter suggests, what about the short end? Is 200 going to be a problem? Are you shooting from the sidelines or from the stands? If after reviewing your most commonly used focal length you find 200 won't do it, then you could look at the Sigma 60-600 Sport. It's about the same price as the Sony and would give you more at the wide end but is a bit heavier yet.  Two other options would be the Sigma 150-600 and the Tamron 150-500. Both are similar in weight to the others, maybe a touch lighter.   Lastly, and if reach is your problem, then this may not work, you could look at the Tamron 50-400. It's an amazing lens, sharp from end to end, considerably smaller and lighter than the others, and costs less. I use it all the time, thousands of shots, and it never disappoints. But 400 may not be long enough for you.  FWIW, I have the 200-600. It gets taken out about 3 times a year, while the 50-400 goes with me every time. If you go with one of the larger lenses, plan on using a monopod just to help with supporting it for a few hours.     
    • Some questions to help you formulate the answer to your own question: In what sense do you feel your 70-350 is lacking? What do you hope to gain from this 'upgrade'? What % of your shots are in the 70-200 range? If this % is significant, the 200-600 is not an option unless you carry two cameras or don't mind lens swapping. What % of your shots is at 350mm and potentially could have benefitted from more reach? Do you need high resolution shots or is cropping in post an option to fix your compositions? Would carrying a lens over twice as big and over 3 times as heavy have a negative impact on your photography (think of fun, mobility, physical strain, packing volume)?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...