Jump to content

Highly rated with Leica Glass


kenneth
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/diglloyd-a7rii-focus-accuracy-better-than-any-dslr-ive-ever-used-ming-thein-doesnt-like-the-camera/

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I just got my first Sony last night. (A7Rii) I plan to use Leica and Canon FD lenses on my Sony. I tired the Rokinon 12mm, but it is a monster and sending it back. While I like a lot about the Sony A7Rii, I'd prefer it if it did not have a viewfinder on top and did not have the big grip. I prefer to carry my cam by the lens and not the grip. I generally only use wide angles and normal lenses. Also wish it had a shutter speed dial and not program dial - I just shoot manual, unless it is with a camera that can't be adjusted easily then I keep it on the dummy setting..

 

My current cameras are Leica rangefinders and the Fuji X-E1 and I still shoot them. I shoot manual and in dim light and the AF wont work on the current crop of cameras out there. (Although I've never tried Sony glass.) In any case, the Sony lenses are dummied down, no manual controls, aperture ring or zone focus markings, so they are not for me.

 

Diglloyd is a landscaper, I do street and social doc work in poor light, these are 2 different areas. Well, will see how it goes with the Sony. It is a very impressive camera and am excited about trying something new.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I just got my first Sony last night. (A7Rii) I plan to use Leica and Canon FD lenses on my Sony. I tired the Rokinon 12mm, but it is a monster and sending it back. While I like a lot about the Sony A7Rii, I'd prefer it if it did not have a viewfinder on top and did not have the big grip. I prefer to carry my cam by the lens and not the grip. I generally only use wide angles and normal lenses. Also wish it had a shutter speed dial and not program dial - I just shoot manual, unless it is with a camera that can't be adjusted easily then I keep it on the dummy setting..

 

My current cameras are Leica rangefinders and the Fuji X-E1 and I still shoot them. I shoot manual and in dim light and the AF wont work on the current crop of cameras out there. (Although I've never tried Sony glass.) In any case, the Sony lenses are dummied down, no manual controls, aperture ring or zone focus markings, so they are not for me.

 

Diglloyd is a landscaper, I do street and social doc work in poor light, these are 2 different areas. Well, will see how it goes with the Sony. It is a very impressive camera and am excited about trying something new.

I'm mostly manual but have a couple of sony AF lenses (20mm/2.8 and the bundle zoom), both do AF quite well untill it's pretty dark as no full moon dark. With my manual lenses I prefer A mode as it's most convinient for me to preset the aperture. With a6300 there's no problem to pick a ISO high enough to have adequate shutter speeds. Adapted lenses from Minolta SR and Nikon fits..
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...