Jump to content

Zeiss Flektogon with K&F M42 adapter - gap between lens and adapter


DJ72
 Share

Recommended Posts

Last week I purchased the Zeiss Flektogon 35mm 2.4. for my Sony A7rii

I also purchased the K&F M42 NEX adapter

The lens attaches ok, and I can take photographs.

However there is a gap between the lens and the adapter. This cant be right!

Has anyone seen this? This is the right adapter isnt it?

Please help!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, despite your misgivings, you have checked the photos that you have taken ?

Or

Have you not taken any  , yet  due to the assumed   gap ?

Go out, take a series of photos, then view the card on your computer.

That will imediately tell you, if its all sealed correctly

or if light is somehow getting  in ?

Get back to us, with your findings.

Good Luck

Edited by Wally The Confused
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...