Jump to content

Wally The Confused

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Wally The Confused last won the day on February 4

Wally The Confused had the most liked content!

About Wally The Confused

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,350 profile views
  1. It is built for low light photography, so unless your birthdays and hikes, are at night, you might want to look at the ordinary A 7 III or the even faster A7 R III..... My impression is, the A 7 III series, is made more for video, than stills, So unless you are only on about video, you could save a ton o money by buying any of the A7 II series , which are very good cameras !
  2. Yes, unfortunately, its a bit of a design fault ! Due to the lens release button, being inside the hand grip, if you are trying for a complex angle, as you grip the camera, you can inadvertently press the release button, and instead of zooming , you just unscrew the lens ! I had the 24 - 70 F 2.8, and in a boatyard shot, I thought I was zooming the lens......but no, I was unscrewing it ! It fell off and the front lens scabbed off, about a third of the diameter ! Strangely enough, my B & W expensive filter, stayed intact, but due to the dent, could not be removed from the lens. Thank God, I bought the lens through Jessops, and took out the 3 yr extra insurance, Ok the lens, has in the meantime dropped in price, so all in all, I lost 100 quid. In the meantime,Sony brought out the 24 - 105, which, even though, it is not a G master lens, is more versatile, and , takes photos, every bit as good as the 24 - 70, so I used the insurance money, to buy that one, instead of another 24 - 70. Good Luck !
  3. Try a couple of independent reviews ? https://www.dxomark.com/sony-fe-16-35mm-f28-gm-lens-review-highest-rated-wide-angle-zoom/ https://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/lenses/16-35mm-f28.htm https://www.cameralabs.com/sony-fe-16-35mm-f2-8-gm-review/ Now you can compare findings ! Hope it works out !
  4. I mainly use my local Jessops , for my cameras lenses etc, and if anything doesn`t seem right, I go in and ask. Presumably any reputable dealer, would be able to look at your originals, and tell you , if the lens is defective, in any way. Perhaps google independent reviews of that lens, to see what others have experienced ? https://phillipreeve.net/blog/sony-fe-16-35mm-f4-za-t-review/ https://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/zeiss/16-35mm.htm Good Luck
  5. I have no idea, of what you are trying to achieve ? Covid Video with book text ? I suggest you contact, Fixation, or any other reputable Camera & Lens rental Company, rent whatever lens, takes your fancy, and see how the results , stack up. Then you will be able to buy whichever lens best fits , whatever it is, you are trying to do. Good Luck !
  6. Excuse me, for perhaps being stupid ? Doesn´t a fixed aperture, of F 2.8, mean, it is fixed ? Ie, throughout the whole focal length, its always going to be F2.8???
  7. Doesnt look like you have anyone, close by ! Guess you will have to extend your search area, or as a short cut ? Google, Sony USA, then ask where is your nearest dealer / service center ! Good Luck !
  8. It would really have to be low light, to make a difference ! However, in extreme situations, you can screw the ISO up to insane levels, with the sony stuff & still get great pix Good luck , with your choice !
  9. Boa Tarde ! No ! Para Atuelizar el Software, neccessito una Cabo USB especial, para Sony ! El cabo Sony, es mas gordo, que los Cabos normal ! Tu cabo USB nāo é Sony = No Funktiona !
  10. Pieter, Nothing is perfect, but for most photographers the 35 mm f 1.4 ticks most boxes. I also read, for example that for ordinary photographers, paying three times the price, for the 50 mm f 1.4, was not worth it, since the 50mm f 1.8 gave just as good results, unless you were doing laboratory work ? As regards Ken Rockwell, he did, in his test of the 35 mm f 1.4 , say, it was the sharpest of the group, or whatever, outperforming the Sigma Art 35 mm. Subsequent reviews, of his, I have not read. I got my 35mm f 1.4 , second hand, at a good price from a reputable dealer, and so far, it is doing a great job.
  11. I rented the 70 - 200 f 2.8 from Fixation, for a weekend in Brighton ! Yes the Pics were amazing ! But Jeez, the weight was just too much ! I had a camera bag slung over my shoulder, and had to lay the camera on it, as I was walking around with it ! It was so heavy, I at 66 , would never ever buy one ! Yes rent, if the need arizes but I couldnt carry that around all day The F 2.8 allows you to shoot in very low light , F 4 Not so much ! So, if Low Light is what you want, why not go, for the 35 mm f 1.4 ? Even Ken Rockwell declares it as the sharpest ever lens ! Outsmarting the Sigma 35 mm ART ! Do not get caught up, in a lens buying frenzy, because you wil just go paranoid, about never having the right lens, on the camera, at the time of any given event ! Rent whatever you want ! Test the lenses, over a weekend or whatever, then what ever hits your sweet spot ? Thats the one to buy Good Luck , with your choice !
  12. Well, according to Ken Rockwell, the Sony / Zeiss Distagon 35 mm 1.4 , is the sharpest lens he has ever tried. Yes, as you say, for portraits, prime lenses almost always give best results . However at almost twice the price, the 16 - 35 , considering the reviews, does offer more versatility. Perhaps visit your local sony shop, and ask to try both ? Then see, what you like best ? Or as an alternative, rent one from Fixation, for a day or 2, then see ? Thats what I did, with the 70 - 200, and as good as it was, it was so heavy, I didn´t bother buying one. Good luck, either way
  13. I had the Sony 24 - 70 2.8 , on my A9, until a mishap, caused it to fall off, mid zoom ! Luckily I had the extra insurance, and even though the 24 - 105 is not a G master lens, after trying it, I opted for that, rather than another Sony 24 70. I have not found any area, where I can say , the 24 - 105 is in any way, inferior to the 24 70. Good luck with your choice !
  14. So, were the last 2 photos, taken with the A 7 R III ? Or are there more coming ?
  15. Muchas Gracias. Buen Hecho Felipe ! Interesting comparison of lenses, in English.
  • Create New...