Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi to all

 

, I am new on your forum. I did a little research but could not get the results I wanted to see. I have a question for the Sony A7 III users about battery life of the original Sony NP FZ100. Particular for the still photography. Maximum shoots that did you achieved with the camera? And also is out there replacement but good alternative for the NP FZ100 battery and external charger?   

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

YMMV, but I have never needed to change the battery during the course of a day's shoot.  On the other hand, I am not a wedding or sports photographer. I have been using the Watson charger from B&H with good results, but use only the Sony NP FZ100 batteries. No problems with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow LiveShots that is amazing and I assume that is shooting JPEG?  I tend to find that I get around 1000 Raw images on my A9 when mostly using the 100-400 Gmaster + 1.4 TC and with very little chimping and I am very happy with that.

I also only use genuine Sony batteries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also on an a9 and genuine Sony batteries, but have never shot anything near 1000 images on the same day. Hence did never have to swap batteries during a day. So I can't contribute on that matter.

Commenting on the differences between @Iansky 's and @LiveShots 's reports, I would assume that moving lots of glass like in focussing a big tele lens drains the battery apparently much faster than shooting "Hi fps" without re-focussing in between. In addition, frequently shutting down and rebooting the camera like I expect is more prevalent in @Iansky 's usage profile puts also more load on the battery (without necessarily increasing the shot count, btw.), compared to having few boot-shutdown cycles and shooting many frames in "Hi fps" mode.

So it's really not that easy, to do a meaningful comparison. Too many unknowns involved, imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shooting RAW; For shooting events I typically have the camera mounted on a tripod and operating via a PocketWizard remote (Plus III). I have the camera setup to auto sleep after a minute, a half press on the remote wakes it up. 

For comparison, I attended an Air Show this past weekend, lots of switching the camera off and on between acts and a lot of re-focus etc. and drained one battery after 2500 shots. I was the using the battery grip this time and one battery is completely empty and the other at 100% after six hours of shooting off and on.

Edited by LiveShots
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use an a7rIII, sometimes with battery grip, only Sony z100 batteries and I agree with any and all of the above. In addition you can decrease battery if the monitor brightness is regularly set at brighter settings. I regularly get 1,000 to 1,200 shots per battery per charge.

I use 3 Z100's in rotation with both the original Sony charger and a Watson dual chargers. Is there a difference in long term battery life when using a charger other than Sony's?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

i only get around 350-400 shots on my A7iii, although I do use the monitor to change menus quite a lot and use play back to review some photos.

Have turned off everything that I can think of to minimise battery drain including putting camera on airplane mode.

l am a little disappointed and any advice would be appreciated 

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toby97 said:

and use play back to review some photos

Brightness of the screen comes to my mind. And of course the cumulated length of time, during which you "review some photos".

Turning off unused functions always helps. OTOH, it doesn' make sense crippling an expensive camera like yours by throttling functions you do use on a regular basis. Maybe a second (or even third) battery would give you more value, at your current pattern of usage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toby97 said:

Hi

i only get around 350-400 shots on my A7iii, although I do use the monitor to change menus quite a lot and use play back to review some photos.

Have turned off everything that I can think of to minimise battery drain including putting camera on airplane mode.

l am a little disappointed and any advice would be appreciated 

Thanks

 

I guess you can drain the battery by reviewing photos without shooting a single picture. (According to what I read, the evf uses more juice than the monitor. ) There are too many unknown variables to say if 350-400 is disappointing. Not only the amount of reviewing, but temperature, age of the battery etc. play a role. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience with this battery in an A7r3 is rather good. When I am in a hide out to shoot birds, the camera is on continuous for about 5-6 hours. Over that period I may have shot 600-800 photos, all on a single battery. At the end of the session the battery is near empty. When the camera was new ( and so was the battery) the battery was not empty at the end of the session. The batteries ( I have 2) are now 20 months old and I would estimate they have now 75-80% of their original capacity. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

(background)

- I'd prefer not to start a new topic to pass-along information if an existing topic is suitable.

- I try and take care of things and get as much life out of them as possible - some battery chemistries have very specific likes-and-dislikes as regards their minimum-level-of-charge.

-------------------------------------

I was unsure to what level-of-charge (for maximum life) it was prudent to allow the Sony NP-FZ100 Battery (used in my Sony α7 III Camera) to get to before recharging so I had a 'chat session' with Sony this morning. I was told to recharge the NP-FZ100 Battery once its level-of-charge reached 5 percent. The Sony person emphasized (twice) to leave the battery on the charger for four hours.

- Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...