Jump to content

A7ii and the HVL F32M flash


Recommended Posts

In the old days of film I would mount my flash unit on an L bracket attached to the camera. A simple cable from the flash to the camera and you were good to go. Is the same set up workable today with the above listed camera and flash? Obviousely there is no cable now, so can it work wirelessly?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are cables but they are from another era (Minolta) and they are very expensive. Search on the Sony web site.

 

There are 2 or 3 ways to achieve this using Minolta cables combined with Sony adapters.

 

Option 1 :

- Sony FA-CS1M on your camera shoe

- Minolta Cable CD (or Sony equivalent)

- Sony FA-CS1M mounted on the foot that is supplied with your flash to mount it on the bracket ( and it may look clumsy with that foot standing out)

 

Option 2 :

- Sony ADP-MAA adapter on your camera shoe

- Minolta Cable OC-1100 (or Sony equivalent)

- Minolta OS-1100 shoe (which has a mounting thread underneath) on which you mount a Sony ADP-AMA adapter (notice the different name)

 

A company called Mello, i think makes a simple and less expensive all in one cable but it will be limited in length to .5 to 1meter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sony has wireless flashes, but I found them unimpressive (32) or overheat (60). Went to a Nissin i40 and was really happy with it as it had manual adjustment dials on the rear, and given the high ISO capability, worked fine for most on camera flash situations.

 

Wanted wireless and the the Nissin solution is cheap (cheaper than Sony though) and 'is coming' but has been coming for ages!

 

I have now moved to Godox which not only allows 2.4g transmissions between their transmitters and flashes but allows interaction between their wireless flashes and wireless receivers for different bands (Nikon/Canon/Sony/Olympus/Fuji). With this, I can use my existing Canon flashes along with Godox Sony version flashes wirelessly with my A7RII and it just works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...