Jump to content

Pictures taken with Sony 70-200/f4 (A7II) not so sharp


Recommended Posts

......... I thought this lens was as sharpest aroung 5.6 and up?

 

.............   

 

    

On a 4.0 lens, 5.6 is only one stop down. Certainly 

will be better than wide open, but it's only the first 

incremental improvement. The best IQ begins at 

about 2 stops down, with more improvement at 3 

and sometimes 4 stops down. Then it deteriorates 

if you stop down much more, due to the small iris 

opening beginning to approximate a pinhole "optic" 

[iQ loss due to diffraction].  

   

Altho there's a stop or two of improvement beyond 

f/8.0, to see that difference you'll hafta idealize all 

other variables [magnificent tripod, low ISO, truly 

accurate focus, etc etc]. OTOH, given half decent 

technique, you should easily detect the difference 

between f/5.6 and 8.0 by "zooming in".  

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a 4.0 lens, 5.6 is only one stop down. Certainly 

will be better than wide open, but it's only the first 

incremental improvement. The best IQ begins at 

about 2 stops down, with more improvement at 3 

and sometimes 4 stops down. Then it deteriorates 

if you stop down much more, due to the small iris 

opening beginning to approximate a pinhole "optic" 

[iQ loss due to diffraction].  

   

Altho there's a stop or two of improvement beyond 

f/8.0, to see that difference you'll hafta idealize all 

other variables [magnificent tripod, low ISO, truly 

accurate focus, etc etc]. OTOH, given half decent 

technique, you should easily detect the difference 

between f/5.6 and 8.0 by "zooming in".  

 

Ok, thanks, will keep that in mind also... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 5/2/2017 at 12:12 AM, UglyBob said:

 

Ok, thanks, will keep that in mind also... :)

Hi UglyBob,

Did you figure out what was wrong? I have a similar issue with the kit lens 28-70 and Sony a7 body.

Thank you,

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is two years old, unlikely OP is still watching.  Having said that, I have this lens and it is very sharp.  Folks forget that at increasing focal lengths faster shutter speeds are necessary.  I try to use shutter speed of 1/1000 or faster and let the camera adjust ISO automatically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...