Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I’ve been shooting RAW since picking up my A9 and love it... about 2 weeks ago I started shooting both raw and jpeg. Obviously the highest jpeg setting is Fine when shooting in this mode... I shoot mainly wildlife and as I pulled up the side by side comparisons, to my surprise the jpeg files are more clear and detailed than the RAW... I was completely shocked... I can zoom all the way in on a duck in flight and the image starts pixelating in the RAW way before the jpeg. This is in Windows Photo Viewer so I thought maybe it’s just this program so I opened both files in my PhotoDirector 9 program and still the RAW images are not as clear as the jpeg... is this normal? Anybody else experience this with their A9!?

Thanks in Advance!

Taylor

Link to post
Share on other sites

JPEG will usually look better than RAW until the RAW has been processed, this is true of any camera. I recommend CaptureOne for working with Sony RAW files.

Thanks for the response. I kept researching this last night and that was the general rule... this morning I pulled those images into PhotoDirector9, but no matter what I did with them I just could not get rid of the pixelation. I’m assuming this program is not up to speed with the A9 raw file. I will download capture one tonight and see if I can get better results. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I tried downloading Capture 1 on my desktop with windows 8... didn’t work

 

I then downloaded it on my laptop with Windows 8.1 and was able to edit the same Raw image in both editing programs...

 

Results:

I am able to edit the RAW image in Capture 1 and clearly make it a better end result Picture than the Jpegs... When using PhotoDirector I just can not do this, so maybe they are just behind on their RAW file editing stuff

 

I then ran into another problem. After editing the RAW file to my liking and exporting it into a jpeg I opened the jpeg in the Windows Photo Viewer and the image did not look the same. It had lost the colors I had boosted and lost some clarity... maybe that program needs to be updated as well I don’t know but... thoughts!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be a difference between sRGB and Adobe color spaces...

 

Not sure if Windows 8 is still a supported OS.

 

When I edit on CaptureOne and produce to JPG, it looks the same when I open in OSX Preview...

 

So I think the the issue is that you have a cutting edge camera and now, cutting edge editing software, running on a very old OS....

 

If you can, try sending the jpg to another laptop with newer OS and compare side by side..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

I skipped Windows 8 but it sounds like a regular colour space issue. Make sure you select sRGB when exporting to jpeg, if it's for sceen viewing.

 

In the past, photographers would work gradually towards more advanced gear and techniques. These days, people jump straight from mobile phones to professional cameras, losing out on the learning stages in-between.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.........

 

In the past, photographers would work gradually towards

more advanced gear and techniques. These days, people

jump straight from mobile phones to professional cameras,

losing out on the learning stages in-between.

   

That view of the rosy past is thru rosy glasses. I recall 

them jumping from Instamatics and Polaroids directly 

to AE-1s. Your "rosy memory" was rather true before 

the AE-1. When that turd hit the table it was a sad day,  

and that happened decades before digital photo.  

   

The AE-1 was the 1st SLR mass marketed by a huge 

TV campaign, pulling The Great Unwashed into photo.   

Shortly after that sad day, things got worse as Nikon,

Minolta, etc etc mimicked the AE-1 ...... 

    

It was also a sad day for the FD mount, which became 

the FD-N mount to appease all the noobs who couldn't 

fathom the FD's simple and secure breach lock ring :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

................

 

Not sure if Windows 8 is still a supported OS.

 

...............

  

Altho MS toadally dropped Win8 support, most

non-MS software documentation still mentions

it, as they must, given the installed base ATM. 

  

I run Win8 and Win10, and rendering appears 

to be the same, allowing for minor differences   

in the hardware. I've not felt moved to update

my Win8 PC. It is what it is, until it croaks. [My

other Win8 machine croaked last year]. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I’m exporting Jpeg in sRGB

 

I am shooting RAW in adobeRGB

 

I can export the same image with same settings from PhotoDirector then open the jpeg in Windows Photo Viewer and I do not have this problem

 

I attempted to do all the updates my laptop to see if that would help but now it seems that it has froze at 0% updating...

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I shot in Jpeg and RAW sRGB then edited it in Capture One, exported in sRGB and now have no color change in the exported image but the Clarity is still not the same. Kinda like if you jacked up the clarity to 100 in Capture One but the exported image looks like you only jacked up the clarity to 75... wierd... still not sure what’s going on here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AI sez: The CHIPFANCIER CFexpress Type A 4.0 memory card offers 1700MB/s read speeds and is VPG400 certified, making it suitable for 8K video and high-speed shooting. However, some users have reported limitations in frame rates with this card.  Don't know if that applies, but it sounds similar. Any chance on using/getting a different card? The A7 IV has a ridiculous buffer, it shouldn't slow down at all with a good card. 
    • Make sure camera and lens is updated to latest firmware. 
    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...