Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Soon I will leave for a hiking trip and plan to shoot a lot of pics. Sadly enough there wont be electricity for days, my sony a7 is known to consume a lot of energy and to make matters worse it will be cold (hopefully not to rainy). What should I get to?

 

Gear now:

Sony A7

1 standard battery

1 car to usb 

 

Extra batteries, how many? I follow this dicussion: http://www.sonyalphaforum.com/topic/666-a72-battery-question/

Charger via solar power?

Powerbank?

Other?

 

Any good advices and experiences? Which option is most reliable and gives flexibility? Cheap and likely hood of using after? What is weight & seize?

 

Ciao from The Netherlands

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best solution other than carrying a large number of spare batteries is a solar charger. What you need is a 12 volt foldable solar panel and a charger for the Alpha 7 batteries that comes with a 12 volt adapter. 

then you can either drape the panel over your backpack, connecting the charger to the panel or if you will be stopping for a couple of hours periodically lay out the solar panel and connect to the charger while stopped.

I used a system like that on 2 passages by raft through the Grand Canyon lasting 2 1/2 weeks and kept my alpha 99 and alpha 77 batteries topped up that way.

You will need at least 1 extra battery and probably more in addition to the charging system. 

The other solutions suggested in the prior post are mainly good for augmenting power input into the Alpha 7 presuming available supply of already charged batteries.

Charge time should be 3-4 hours if you are in full sun.

You may find charge is incomplete (70-80%) if you have partial sun or shade. Hence the value of having a couple of extra batteries.

Depending on the number of shots you plan on making simply carrying a supply of batteries is unlikely to satisfy you. If by days you only mean 3-4 days I suppose you could carry an adequate supply of batteries if you don't mind the weight, but if you are planning a couple weeks between charging opportunities, then I think solar is your only practical option. 

 

The URL for the vendor I used is:

http://store.sundancesolar.com/solar-digital-camera-battery-charger-for-sony-with-5w-foldable-powerfilm-solar-panel/

 

It has been 3-4 years and i am sure products have changed. the key is you want something with a 12 volt output, and with a 12 volt cigarette lighter type adapter, as well as a 'charger for the Sony battery that has a connector to the cigarette lighter type adapter. The vendor I referenced may supply that or you can find one on eBay or Amazon.

 

I hope this is helpful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently did a seven day hiking trip through a remote part of NZ's South Island and took four batteries, which are cheaper to purchase than a solar charger. I bought Watson's from B&H and they have been just fine, and despite taking between 500 and 600 images, I didn't need to start on my last battery until the morning of the last day. I have it in airplane mode with the remote off, and usually have the back screen set so that it is just showing info with the image showing only in the viewfinder. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

......... I have it in airplane mode with the remote off,

and usually have the back screen set so that it is just

showing info with the image showing only in the viewfinder.

IIRC, your efforts about the screen do not save energy.

The screen has a constant degree of backlighting and it

looks darker or brighter according to how much the image

layer blocks that light. AN OLCD [Organic LCD] does save

energy. It works the way you think your regular LCD works,

IOW a dimmer/darker image uses less power. Again IIRC,

the EVF is an OLCD. So ... to save energy when hiking, or

whenever you have no electric power, go into the menu to

shut off the Auto-EVF-to-Monitor sensor/control and use

only the EVF. You CAN control everything while looking

into the eyepiece. You may find it unconventional and/or

not the utmost as to convenience, but when conserving

power reserves is a priority, thaz life.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • From my records, Minolta made about 8500 85mm F 1.7 lenses bearing the MD badge. The MC-X version was slightly double that. So these are not that rare. I just saw an ad for a Limited Rare MD 45mm F2 lens ( Minolta made over a million of these) so the word rare is often used in a bizarre way. Seeing that the OP has a MD ROKKOR-X version and that he appears to have bought it from Europe is kind of unusual since the ROKKOR-X versions were to be sold exclusively in America. So in Europe, this lens naming was rare.  I think the confusion about a reworked version may come from the fact that during the MC-X era (1972-76), Minolta made numerous changes to their lens line-up. First they changed the lens Mount Index dot which was initially painted like their previous series of lenses but after about 1 year, they replaced this with a slightly larger diameter plastic bead. This change happened around the introduction of the X-1, XM, XK bodies. Then they removed the small Stop Down Levers that were on most lenses up to now around 1975 since their SR T and XK/XE bodies were now boasting a Stop down mechanism. Then a little later Minolta even removed the lens formula (in this case PG) designation from the lens markings. This may have caused people to believe there was some kind of modification to the lens when it was only a marking  change. Also around 1973-74 they decided to provide a different marking for lenses sold in America ( at least USA and Canada) to identify lenses sold on the grey market that was often cause for confusion with consumers buying a great deal they could not get repaired under warranty. Same applies to Bodies starting in the same era where  X-1 was for Asian market, XK for American market and X-M for rest of the world, then SR T 102 in America, SR T Super in Asia and SR T 303 in rest of the world. So you could find all of the following with their respective front markings: - MC-II: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL) This type has the hills and valleys metal focusing ring -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Painted Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X marking for the American market) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (Orange colored ROKKOR-X again for the American market) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (White colored ROKKOR-X ( iguess orange paint was getting too expensive) ) It was then replaced with the MD-II MD ROKKOR (X) 85mm F 2 There was no MD-I version of this lens and the same with a few lenses with large apertures ( 35mm F 1.8, 58mm F 1.2, 300mm F 4.5) since they had issues with the speed of the aperture mechanisms closing down for what was  a last minute check on XD/XD-7 and XD-11 bodies requiring stopping the lens down just prior to the shutter opening to ensure accurate exposure. Some late MC-X lenses may have had the modified aperture mechanism causing the confusion that there was an updated version but the optical formula seems to indicate there was no change.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • It could probably be used directly on the A7R ( or any other body using the Sony MIS shoe) in manual mode provided it can be positioned properly in spite of the zillion contacts Sony placed on these bodies at the front of the shoe which may prevent the shoe from making proper contact at the center. If proper central contact is not achieved, using a ADP-MAA adapter topped by a Minolta FS-1100 will do the trick. Tried it with older flashes like 360PX and a few others and it works. The issue with using it in Manual Mode is that due to the very short distances involved, calculating the proper aperture for correct exposure is a challenge. Add to this that the assist lights will not operate the way they were designed if at all.
    • I've found some great lenses that way too -- like a Tokina 24-200mm AF zoom on a Maxxum 5 for $20.  I sold the camera for $40 and kept the lens.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...