Search the Community
Showing results for tags '90mm'.
Found 9 results
-
Hey guys, I'm looking for a fast 90mm lens for my M 240 and maybe later an A7r to use for sports, concerts and portraits (like the stuff you can see on my Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/48126456@N05/ ). However, I was not able to find any in-depth comparison of the two main options - the Leica Summicron M 90mm (1980 - 1998) and the Leica Summicron M 90mm APO (1998 - current). I only heard that the newer one is "better", but I haven't seen any proof of that. Does anybody have any experience with one or both lenses and can tell me how big the difference is? Or do you know any online comparison between the two? Full size samples would be incredibly helpful too. My budget isn't endless either, but I could get the non-APO version for about €900 and the APO one for about €1 800 used in very good condition - which one represents better value in your opinion? Thank you in advance for any help!
-
I'm loving my recently acquired A7RII. This is a shot of a Monarch Butterfly at a nearby botanical garden. It was shot with the 90mm macro at F8 ISO 800. I would love some feedback.
-
Hello Recently I bought Sony A6000 and become addicted to the old manual lenses. A lot of character and atmosphere. I would like to share some of my photos with my "new" Contax 90mm F2.8 Sonnar T* (I will update the thread) Night London by kalpachev1, on Flickr Night London by kalpachev1, on Flickr Night London by kalpachev1, on Flickr *London fog * by kalpachev1, on Flickr London fog at midnight by kalpachev1, on Flickr The Girl with the Tattoo by kalpachev1, on Flickr The Temple by kalpachev1, on Flickr In the forest by kalpachev1, on Flickr Night food market by kalpachev1, on Flickr to be continued...
-
XAVC, full HD High ISO, no editing, I´m impressed!
-
Straight to the center point of this post....I cannot find enough superlatives to tell you how good this lens is....I have the A7R and A7R11, 16-35 zoom and a super sharp 2.8 35mm and Tamro150-600 with alfa adapter plus a bunch of Minolta legacy lenses. I could post some pics but you could never get a sense of the quality unless you got an original which I am not sure how to make available, Weight wise I don't notice any difference between this lens and the 16-35, of course they as with any lens a few minuses and the only soft minus would be the auto-focus appears a tad slower than I would expect but I have nothing similar to compare it to. I have eagles that daily sit on a tree at eye level on the bank about 70 feet in front of us and I am using the Tamron for the full frame close up but when I was out with the 90mm I just took a shot freehand out of curiosity to see what it would be like ...well when I cropped the result to equal tamron's bird size the 90mm was considerably better( when I cropped it in light room I brightened it a little but nothing else) The pics are not usable to judge quality they are just to illustrate what I am referring to.. Anyhow this is just to pass on to fellow A7 users what an incredible lens this 90mm is and with the A7R11 a brilliant combination that has me running around looking for subjects to use them on..
-
Hi all, this is my first post on this forum, looks nice A couple of portraits I took a few days ago with a Telenar 90mm
-
Hi All! I recently had the chance to play with the new Sony 90mm 2.8 for awhile and thought I'd shoot a little insect video while I had it. Besides being awesome for portrait work and photography, this lens is crazy cool for capturing some weird little creatures. Check it out: I would say this lens is a must own for people who do a lot of portrait of (obviously) macro work. With 4K video it retains an incredible amount of detail and is super sharp. For me, this feels sharper and cleaner than even the magical 55mm F1.8 and, my personal favorite, the Zeiss Loxia line. It's definitely a bit large and that is the main reason that is keeping me from purchasing it. I do a lot of film on the road an I put low-light and multi-functional gear high on the list. Multi-functional (macro, portrait, mid-tele) this lens is, but small for the A7 series it is not. I'd rather take my two Zeiss Loxias for a trip that is going to be mostly video. For photography, I'd find room for this bad boy.
-
I have been surprised to hear that some people were not aware you could uses a Macro lens (the FE 90mm F2.8 G) of shooting portraits. So I have posted a gallery of images on Flickr captured with the 90mm Macro (including Portraits). https://www.flickr.com/photos/markgaler/sets/72157651411628149/ This image was captured with ambient light only, the aperture wide open and with a single white reflector place just below the frame.
-
At f/4 this lens is sharp, but the Jupiter-9 85mm it is sharper still already when opened at two more stops (at f/2). That being said, I find the Jupiter better for b/w work (smoother tonalities), while I like the 90 M-Rokkor much more for its colors. It is extremely compact, and together with the 28/2.8 and the 40/2 M-Rokkor it takes the same space of a tube of chocolates Understory, Sila mountains, Italy (vignetting added in post) Beach house walls, Cetraro, Italy "Tasso" forest ("Beaver" forest) under the snow Winter sea at Lampetia cape, Cetraro, Italy
