Jump to content

I bought a LA-EA3. Now What?


Recommended Posts

Guest Jaf-Photo

If you shoot video and don't use AF, I would suggest using manual lenses with a "dumb" adapter. The manual lenses generally have a lot smoother (and quiter) focus and zoom operation. In that case, you have a smorgasbord to choose from.

 

Otherwise, there's the small beer can, the Minolta AF 35-70/4. It's nice and sharp but clunky to operate manually.

 

At Dyxum, you'll find information about virtually all A Mount lenses, here are the zooms: http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/results.asp?chbLensType=3

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't need AF, why go with the crappy manual focusing of AF lenses? The A7 camera line has such good focus contouring that it's a pleasure to go manual with good old manual lenses! A nice zoom lens is the Canon FD 35-105 f3.5, it has constant aperture, two touch zoom and is parfocal if the adapter is correct. And it's dead cheap for the quality! Another gem is the Minolta 35-70mm f3.5, quite cheap too.

 

If you need anything wider, things get more difficult. Either they are not parfocal, or not constant aperture or even one-touch. Well, there's the Minolta 24-50mm, but that one is soft in the corners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all. My name is Nino and I am new to this Forum. 

I have read all the posts in this thread and ask for help in the following:-

I own a Sony a7II as well as a Minolta 35-70 f3.5-4.5 AF Zoom which works very well and am able to get full exif data.

I also own Sigma and Tokina Lenses with a Nikon Mount and use a Metabones Adaptor and whilst the focus is Manual (not really a great issue) I am not able to get any exif data from their use. Is there an alternative in the market that I can buy that will give me the exif data. AF is a secondary issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Minolta 70-210 F4 which seems superb. Now what for the low

end in primes or wide fixed aperture zooms. I SHOOT VIDEO so

constant aperture for zooming much prefeered. If there is no suitable

A-mount zoom I'll consider a selection of primes.

   

All zoom lenses that fit the LAEA adapters, all 4 versions, are 

operationally constant aperture ... if you don't dial in the wider 

apertures that are unavailable as FL increases. IOW an f:2.8 

to f/4.0 zoom is constant aperture from f:4.0 to f:16. Try it :-)  

It's why my LAEA adapters see far more use than my Sony to

Nikon adapters, even tho I have waaaaay more Nikon lenses. 

    

Do be aware the the smallest aperture at the long end is also 

not in the constant aperture range. It might be f:22 or f:32 and 

would be available only at the longest FLs. But anything you 

set within the constant aperture range will not suddenly grow,  

or shrink, as you zoom to the shortest, or longest, FLs. 

  

Also, using the IBIS in the a7-II, the LAEA informs the IBIS of 

the FL as you zoom. With a dumb adapter, you'll hafta inform 

the IBIS manually of every change in FL. No minor PITA :-(  

    

And acoarst for stills with the LAEA you're always focusing at    

full open maximum aperture regardless of whatever working  

aperture you have dialed in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...