Jump to content

Sony A7II + Tamron 15-30 SP 2.8


drasko2015
 Share

Recommended Posts

A friend borrowed me his Nikon Mount Tamron 15-30 ultra wide lens, ive tried it for some shots on my A7II:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Just curious did you find that the corners were softer when using the adapter with the Tamron 15-30, I was thinking about purchasing this lens but after looking at a few reviews I was wondering if that would be an issue ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the flanges on the adapter are in parallel planes,

no such problem. Any ultra-wide lens is extremely

vulnerable to a failure of parallelism, so you need

a good adapter. 

 

Lack of parallelism results in different areas of the

frame being focused to different distances. Some

will experience this as "soft" corners, and stopping

down does relieve this rather well. But the corners

are not actually soft. The are just sharply focused

at slightly different distances. A scene with depth

will often hide this. OTOH is could exacerbate it.   

   

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$   

   

Get a quality adapter. 3-figgers USD for a simple

"dumb" one, plus extra $$  for full connectivity and  

all the headaches that might bring :-( 

   

I borrowed a friend's $25 Fotasi adapter and it was

parallel, but for that price there may be sample to

sample variation. Also the rear flange and the latch

were not my idea of quality. So I got a MetaBones,

which also tested parallel, altho a tiny bit short of

exact length ... waaaaay better than too long, cuz

you can ignore that, or shim it. [i shimmed it.]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...