Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an area that is a bit like a foreign language to me coming, as I do, from a film based background. What are the groups general feelings about the two choices. Capture One Express is free to use and someone kindly gave me a copy of Photoshop Elements 11?

 

https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/Software/Capture-One-Pro/Highlights.aspx?gclid=COnDzpq9p9QCFQ4R0woddF0P4A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kenneth.

I find Capture One Express (for Sony) a pretty useful program for the Sony RAW images, particularly with it being free with the camera.  Does everything I need it to do personally and also pretty much anything in my work environment... though that's more usually film/video based and I use Resolve 12 light (also free) for that.  I also have access to multiple versions of Photoshop, but often I find it quick and easy to use Capture One.. especially for any batch-conversions to tiff or jpg.
I'm also ex-film (motion picture) but worked with digital imaging for the past 20 years, mostly in technical capacity.
So, as a basic program to start with, I'm happy with it...  there's an Express v Pro check-sheet online at http://downloads.phaseone.com/TestP1Downloads/2d610966-596f-4190-9ea6-5a727036795b/English/Features_ExpressVsPro.pdf if you want to see what it wont do... like tether-capture.
2c

cheers

Chris


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having learned Lightroom well, I found Capture one express not as easy and intuitive to work with. So I stuck with Lightroom. In fact I took a subscription to lightroom and photoshop (costs here €12 / month). I find it great, especially since you have access to your work everywhere if you organize it well. Another advantage is that you are always up-to-date, as newer versions of both lightroom and photoshop are available free as part of the subscription. And you are always legal.

Many tutorials for both programmes are available with adobe and by third parties on youtube. Worth a look!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Capture One is the better program. It has a bit of a learning curve, because the UI and functions are a bit different. But the good news is that they have very good video tutorials. If you spend a couple of hours watching tutorials, the program becomes easy to use and quite powerful too. The UI is customisable, so you can arrange functions in the order you use them, which makes things simpler.

 

Photoshop Elements is not so good, I think it's mainly a way to get people to pay for the full program.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your input guys, as I mentioned I am on a steep learning curve, a digital Neanderthal, having worked many more years than I am keen to remember, with film, both 35mm and M/F however, I am finding the purchase of this new camera seems to have kickstarted my photographic interests, albeit, with my Leica M system and my Rolleiflex TLR but, no matter, it feels good after a few years in the doldrums caused by, I believe the medication effects for chronic depression, thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you for your input guys, as I mentioned I am on a steep learning curve, a digital Neanderthal, having worked many more years than I am keen to remember, with film, both 35mm and M/F however, I am finding the purchase of this new camera seems to have kickstarted my photographic interests, albeit, with my Leica M system and my Rolleiflex TLR but, no matter, it feels good after a few years in the doldrums caused by, I believe the medication effects for chronic depression, thanks again

Kenneth welcome to the digital processing world I suspect digital post processing [DPP] must seem like a minefield, so forgive me if I suggest the following...

 

With no DPP skills (all darkroom I assume) I suggest you take full advantage of the FREE version of Capture One for Sony (it has a few features which have been removed but you are starting at the beginning so for now that won't matter)

 

I responded to your other thread about books on the A7R2 and suggested Gary L Friedman to you in that post, NOW I'm going to recommend another book should you start by using your free C1 for Sony DPP software. There is a learning curve getting into any such software  and I got into Capture One via the Webinars David Grover [Phase One] holds and there are a bunch of recorded webinars on Phase One's YouTube channels, however I found digesting, using and following Sascha Erni's book entitled "Capture One Pro 9" invaluable to get going. C1 is now on V10 but it doesn't invalidate Saschas book.

 

I ended up upgrading to C1 Pro for Sony (about £50) to get the tethering and other features missing from the free version. I then upgraded to Capture One Pro as I wanted to start to work on a mass of Canon RAW files. I must add here that you really must be shooting in RAW or RAW + JPG for any DPP software be worth paying for. JPGs are extremely limited e.g. 8bit and JPGs keep getting recompressed every time you save them and so deteriorate.

 

If you go the Adobe route Photoshop will be a substantial challenge and as you have no Lightroom experience if you go down that route (I did and also DXO and CS6) you can achieve great results but LR6 can't really match what Capture One does IMHO (especially C1's Local Adjustment layers which have almost eliminated my round trips from C1 into CS6) you will also experience a life of subscriptions and stodgy slow enhancements (note C1 does have a subscription model too but I prefer not to go down that road).

 

Both Capture One and Lightroom work on raw files with changes made in XMP files if you wish (basically "on the side" or "Sidecar" files - I use External XMP this makes these programs non-destructive you always have your original RAW files to revert to / fallback on. Photoshop however works on TIFF files created from your raw so you still have them to fallback on BUT what starts out as a 42Mp A7R2 raw can quickly become a 42Mp raw + a 250Mp TIFF with all your changes.

There are lots of DPP software offerings and folks have their preferences. As you are effectively "Tabula Rasa" I'm suggesting investing in ONE product only. After lots of learning and money clearly I've settled on Capture One the hard way.

Best wishes and again welcome and hope your foray into the digital world is a success. My film days and equipment were not as lofty or expensive as yours but I did have my own darkroom all plumbed in and everything - with hindsight it was a good idea for the plumbing extension to have isolating valves so I could tear it down to sell the house ;-) My wife wouldn't hear of another darkroom now!

 

Sorry if this diatribe has gone one too long.

Best wishes healthwise too.

Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...