Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Friends,

I’ve been really playing with my camera more than I ever did and I’m noticing something really weird when I look in the viewfinder the picture looks really sharp. I take the picture and the captured photograph is not blurry, but it’s not as sharp as in the view finder. I have the camera set on continuous auto focus and wide in manual but it seems to happen on intelligent auto too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any specific lens? Is the camera the A7 IV in your signature or A6300? What are you viewing it on? Phone? Monitor? If a monitor, what is the resolution? Cataracts? (not kidding, been there). 

There could be any number of reasons this is happening, but your description is too general. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are looking at it on the rear screen, do bear in mind that the rear screen is generally quite a bit lower resolution than the view finder.

Did you know that you can review the images in the view finder? You just hold the camera to your eye and press the image review button. That should show you the same image as you saw before you took the shot.

Of course, the real judgment comes when you download the images onto the computer - they should look a lot more detailed then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least two things can "happen" between you seeing the subject in the viewfinder and the picture actually being taken.  One if that the focus can change, and you can't see the effect of the shutter speed.  Plus, "not blurry" and "not as sharp" is kinda , well, blurry.

It's easy to run a test check.  Put the camera on a tripod or secure surface, and take pictures with and without AF.  Then compare the results.  If it doesn't happen with manual focus, it's either the AF setting, or the viewfinder diopter, or your vision.  Take some time to try to nail down the problem.  Do it always happen or just sometimes, like when the f-stop is wide open?

Take good notes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, XKAES said:

Put the camera on a tripod or secure surface, and take pictures with and without AF.  Then compare the results.  If it doesn't happen with manual focus, it's either the AF setting, or the viewfinder diopter, or your vision.  Take some time to try to nail down the problem.  Do it always happen or just sometimes, like when the f-stop is wide open?

Be sure to turn off image stabilization with this setup, otherwise you'll need to factor in adverse effects by the IBIS-system as a possible cause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...