Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any experience with purchasing a grey market Len? I'm actually looking at the Sony Zeiss 55mm lens that is frequently posted on sonyalpharumor's page and wondering if it's a good idea to get a brand new one for $699.

 

Thanks ahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically there won't be any real warranties - consider this way, if all lenses come with no warranty, and you will have to pay more for the warranty. FE 55 RRP 699, FE 55 with x years manufacturer warranty RRP 899, which option will you pick?

 

I have bought two grey import lenses, one from Sony one from Sigma, never had a problem, but I can see the potential problems and headaches if there is anything goes wrong with them. Personally, I won't buy grey imported now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

t

 

Basically there won't be any real warranties - consider this way, if all lenses come with no warranty, and you will have to pay more for the warranty. FE 55 RRP 699, FE 55 with x years manufacturer warranty RRP 899, which option will you pick?

 

I have bought two grey import lenses, one from Sony one from Sigma, never had a problem, but I can see the potential problems and headaches if there is anything goes wrong with them. Personally, I won't buy grey imported now.

thanks for the input!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont have   Sony a7r II on amazon.de, if i search on idealo.de, there is only one shop which sells sony a7rii, only option is grey market, with warranty from noname shop

 

please tell me can i trust this shop? do i really get 3 years warranty?

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Sony-Alpha-a7R-II-42MP-4K-Fullframe-PAL-NTSC-Camera-3-Year-Worldwide-Warranty-/121769450599?hash=item1c5a065c67:g:RPoAAOSw0HVWBH~s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sony Vario-Tessar T*E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS SEL1670Z Carl Zeiss for NEX +55UV *USA*
Started by CoastJun 02 2015 10:16 PM

Hello; I'm Coast, 

I have bought the above lens 

 

A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging PAID : $749.99 

​I bought it because it said US, I assumed it was an American copy. I found it was in Japanese, but it did say clearly warranty good in Japan only. It was March 2015, The lens was selling everywhere else for $999 (Amazon etc,) but w a 1 yr limited warranty. So I've had these questions for a while maybe the forum can answer. Does this mean we are paying $250 for a 1Yr limited warranty? Or does it mean I got a Hong Kong knockoff ?

 

 

I'm not that happy w the lens it looks good, feels good, works good. It's sharper in the center than the kit, but not by that much. I'm pretty impressed w the kit, its power zoom, auto focus, steady shot, pancake size and pretty sharp. The Zeiss does have noticeable barrel effect @ 16mm and w pixel peeking it does have fall off and purple in the corners, but @ $750 I like it @ $1,000 would not so much

 

my Sony a6000 package bundle I use the Zeiss on I bought it on last cyber Monday 2014 for $750 @ a Best Buy store. I love my a6000

 

What got me also was your article "Back in stock Zeiss SEL55F18Z + 3 yr warranty for $777

How much of that $777 is the 3 yr warranty?

 

Thank you very much________Coast

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Make sure camera and lens is updated to latest firmware. 
    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...