Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There certainly are a TON of lenses that you can use on those two "dead-end" cameras -- going back 35 years.  The selection is MUCH greater than for "alive-beginning" cameras.  PLUS, you can get these "dead-end" lenses and accessories for a LOT less -- and I do mean A LOT!!!

But don't pay any attention to me -- I'm a ZOMBIE who is happy munching on two "dead-end" a850 cameras, and a ton of "dead-end" lenses -- from 12.5mm to 1250mm.

Edited by XKAES
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rotflmao!  I am not talking about old fogies like thou and I who has been shooting for more than a generation and carry a lot of baggage around.  I still have my Linhof Super Technika 4x5 view camera which I haven't shot with in decades.  Now I don't even know if I can source cut film locally never mind a lab to process it.  The OP is asking about buying a Sony A-mount camera which Sony mothballed in favour of the e-mount MILC.  If the OP wants to continually expand his/her photographic journey, it makes better sense to invest in the e-mount camera which Sony is actively developing and marketing instead of the A-mount which Sony has mothballed.

Contrary to what you say about availability of Minolta/Konica gear, I am not seeing it in my neck of the woods.  Kerrisdale Cameras, a local camera store that's been around longer than I have been on the West Coast, buys and sells used camera equipment and checking their stock of Konica and Minolta lenses I see very little oem lenses.  In fact, it's the same for all oem lenses.  What is available are mostly 3rd party low-end consumer zoom lenses that no one seems to want, seeing as how the listing hardly changes from the weeks before.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your universe is not everyone's.  I have no problem at all getting whatever I need for my 50 old cameras -- from 4x5 down to Minox (make that 70 years old).  My "dead end" cameras will still be working fine after your newer electronic wonders are useless.  That's what I call a DEAD END.  But, unlike you, I'm going to try to support photographers along their journey.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2022 at 5:06 AM, XKAES said:

Your universe is not everyone's.  I have no problem at all getting whatever I need for my 50 old cameras -- from 4x5 down to Minox (make that 70 years old).  My "dead end" cameras will still be working fine after your newer electronic wonders are useless.  That's what I call a DEAD END.  But, unlike you, I'm going to try to support photographers along their journey.

 

Sorry for not replying sooner - I had to resolve some emergency work around the home.

Good for you XKAES, but my point is that there is a dwindling supply of good quality vintage gear and what is available is getting more and more expensive.  Besides, you have been accumulating vintage gear for so long, what more is there for you to get?  Even I who live in the limited universe,have no great desire to acquire anymore vintage gear. 

You, as the proud owner of two landmark Sony A850 to call them DEAD END, I am left wondering what your point is...

For the last, that's awfully conceited of you XKAES but if you have the capital to impart knowledge to others, please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AI sez: The CHIPFANCIER CFexpress Type A 4.0 memory card offers 1700MB/s read speeds and is VPG400 certified, making it suitable for 8K video and high-speed shooting. However, some users have reported limitations in frame rates with this card.  Don't know if that applies, but it sounds similar. Any chance on using/getting a different card? The A7 IV has a ridiculous buffer, it shouldn't slow down at all with a good card. 
    • Make sure camera and lens is updated to latest firmware. 
    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...