Jump to content

Canon FD 50/55 lens comparison


Sixtyfour
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good test, your conclusion is what I always have felt about legacy 50mm 1.2 lenses, overrated... A nice 50 1.4 would do "just as good" for pennys compared to the 1.2 copies. I have the speedmaster 50 0.95 lens for shooting wide open, but I hardly use it because of the weight and size.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great effort, I really appreciate your information since I still have the 55mm Aspherical to collect, but seems like it just has mainly the collection value. I really love the 50L with the same reasons as you mentioned and I feel it's more sturdy in my hand than the f1.4. Maybe I'm a lucky buyer since I got my 50L for about $350. One more test would be great if you do is comparing the CA control, which I guess where the Aspherical lens is a bit better. That's what I observed with my FD85L and Aspherical version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear you like the review.
Part 2 is up now, with some real world comparison shots.

 

http://www.jeroenterlingen.com/blog/2015/8/26/canon-fd-5055mm-lens-comparison-part-2

 

I did a quick side-by-side in Lightroom of the test on the table. Looking at the chrome edges of the Hasselblad. The 55 Aspherical has better CA control, the 50L is a close second.
You can find the fullres images at my Flickr page.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...