Jump to content

Equipment adjustment/upgrade path

tizeye

By tizeye,
in Sony Alpha Video Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

tizeye Contributor

tizeye

Posted
Posted (edited)

Looking for suggestions on how to proceed as begin shooting video to supplement and/or market a book and photography. Yesterday videoed a 2.2 mile trail (short clips to assemble in post...but required walking entire trail). Another is up to 7 miles, and others that I may bike. Lugging the weight 2.2 miles really tested my limits. My cameras are primarily for still photography, and using their video features.

Current equipment (in addition to mics, lights, etc. not mentioned)
A7rIII - primary video camera
A6000 - B roll duty, with nature hikes may mount telephoto with 16-35 on A7rIII. Plan to upgrade anyway for 4k capability, 6400 for weight/compactness vs 6600 internal video stabilization. Will have to decide on that, but not the issue of this posting.
Heavy Manfrotto tripod with smooth video head, not used on hikes, other than starting clip, then leave in car transferring camera to gimbal. May carry a carbon fiber monopod for the A6000 that I use on still photo hikes.
DJI Ronin-m gimbal/stabilizer for the A7rIII. This is what kills me on a hike...but great output, and a conversation starter on the trail as hikers see me lugging it. Nothing stealth about it!

Upgrades paths to consider...
1) Gimbal/stabilizer. That Ronin-m is a heavy/bulky design - two side handles and top handle. Considering the single handle design but should it be the 4+ lb capacity for the A7rIII or lighter 2 lb capacity that would only support up to the A6000 class camera.
2) A third camera. Something very light weight like a go-pro or a 1" sensor camera such as the Sony RX-100 or ZV-1 to use as primary on long hikes, leaving the A7rIII setup behind. Also waterproof (either by design or external housing) and small enough to use at a snorkling, non-scuba, depth would be a nice addition.

What do you recommend for stabilization for the larger cameras, and the third camera.

Edited by tizeye
Link to post
Share on other sites
tizeye Contributor

tizeye

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, XKAES said:

I'd recommend an assistant.

That would be my wife who has her own ideas...and the correct answer is "Yes, dear."

Yesterday's hike normally a couple hours, but my greeting when returning home 4 hours later was "I didn't know it would take that long!" I can just hear her on the trail with that classic line. Big test will come later this week  with a driving safari. Stopping will be normal but setup for footage is more complex than single composition positioning for stills.

Link to post
Share on other sites
tizeye Contributor

tizeye

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, XKAES said:

Sorry, I meant a PAID assistant.  They are always more agreeable.

FYI, I could never get my wife to even take notes!

Wouldn't be a problem, assistant or even second shooter, if was a paying client and could be calculated into the invoice total price. Unfortunately, I am the client, so it is speculative video with unknown return where paying an assistant would be an immediate cost.

The idea is more marketing related, building a YouTube channel that focuses on some of the sites I listed in a book I published.  The video is just one more marketing opportunity, introducing people the "Central Florida - Beyond the Theme Parks" and a link in the narrative to purchase, as well as other links - like direct photo purchase. If enough people subscribe to meet YouTube requirements, the channel itself could be monetized. The book (lousy royalty) has over 130 sites and over 300 photos and a link for purchasing the photos (Very profitable.) The video itself is quite simple storyline- and want to create 10 before releasing publicly, recommended for initial monetizing push. The storyline for one currently assembling -1) Tripod/shotgun mic selfie - Welcome into by sign/prominent feature, use book as prop and in this case note on page 55.  2) Tripod/shotgun mic focused on map, generally off camera to side or profile view as pointing to places on map and discussion what to expect, 3) Stabilizer/gimbal -Multiple short clips along trail organized in post with voice over. This is what killed me, walking 2.2 miles with all that gear and the reason for this thread. Finally, 4) Closure clip, tripod/shotgun mic  with self  sitting at picnic table, reviewing what just viewed, encouraging to like/subscribe/comment, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
XKAES Experienced

XKAES

Posted
Posted (edited)

My only suggestion would be to offer them a PC of the profits -- or an IOU.

Just be grateful you're not stuck trudging around the Rocky Mountains, like me -- with no assistant in sight.   Not even a donkey.

Best of luck.

Edited by XKAES
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • michelb
      Minolta MD Rokkor 85 mm 1.7

      By michelb · Posted

      From my records, Minolta made about 8500 85mm F 1.7 lenses bearing the MD badge. The MC-X version was slightly double that. So these are not that rare. I just saw an ad for a Limited Rare MD 45mm F2 lens ( Minolta made over a million of these) so the word rare is often used in a bizarre way. Seeing that the OP has a MD ROKKOR-X version and that he appears to have bought it from Europe is kind of unusual since the ROKKOR-X versions were to be sold exclusively in America. So in Europe, this lens naming was rare.  I think the confusion about a reworked version may come from the fact that during the MC-X era (1972-76), Minolta made numerous changes to their lens line-up. First they changed the lens Mount Index dot which was initially painted like their previous series of lenses but after about 1 year, they replaced this with a slightly larger diameter plastic bead. This change happened around the introduction of the X-1, XM, XK bodies. Then they removed the small Stop Down Levers that were on most lenses up to now around 1975 since their SR T and XK/XE bodies were now boasting a Stop down mechanism. Then a little later Minolta even removed the lens formula (in this case PG) designation from the lens markings. This may have caused people to believe there was some kind of modification to the lens when it was only a marking  change. Also around 1973-74 they decided to provide a different marking for lenses sold in America ( at least USA and Canada) to identify lenses sold on the grey market that was often cause for confusion with consumers buying a great deal they could not get repaired under warranty. Same applies to Bodies starting in the same era where  X-1 was for Asian market, XK for American market and X-M for rest of the world, then SR T 102 in America, SR T Super in Asia and SR T 303 in rest of the world. So you could find all of the following with their respective front markings: - MC-II: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL) This type has the hills and valleys metal focusing ring -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Painted Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X marking for the American market) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (Orange colored ROKKOR-X again for the American market) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (White colored ROKKOR-X ( iguess orange paint was getting too expensive) ) It was then replaced with the MD-II MD ROKKOR (X) 85mm F 2 There was no MD-I version of this lens and the same with a few lenses with large apertures ( 35mm F 1.8, 58mm F 1.2, 300mm F 4.5) since they had issues with the speed of the aperture mechanisms closing down for what was  a last minute check on XD/XD-7 and XD-11 bodies requiring stopping the lens down just prior to the shutter opening to ensure accurate exposure. Some late MC-X lenses may have had the modified aperture mechanism causing the confusion that there was an updated version but the optical formula seems to indicate there was no change.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • michelb
      Minolta 1200 AF Macro Flash adapter for Alpha 7R-V camera

      By michelb · Posted

      It could probably be used directly on the A7R ( or any other body using the Sony MIS shoe) in manual mode provided it can be positioned properly in spite of the zillion contacts Sony placed on these bodies at the front of the shoe which may prevent the shoe from making proper contact at the center. If proper central contact is not achieved, using a ADP-MAA adapter topped by a Minolta FS-1100 will do the trick. Tried it with older flashes like 360PX and a few others and it works. The issue with using it in Manual Mode is that due to the very short distances involved, calculating the proper aperture for correct exposure is a challenge. Add to this that the assist lights will not operate the way they were designed if at all.
    • XKAES
      Minolta MD Rokkor 85 mm 1.7

      By XKAES · Posted

      I've found some great lenses that way too -- like a Tokina 24-200mm AF zoom on a Maxxum 5 for $20.  I sold the camera for $40 and kept the lens.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...