Jump to content

Telephoto or Macro Lens

DrJohn

By DrJohn,
in Sony Alpha APS-C Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

DrJohn Rising Star

DrJohn

Posted
Posted

I've been driving myself crazy for years over this topic. The photo below was done with the Sony E 55-210 mm zoom telephoto lens at a distance of about 4 feet set for 210 mm. The minimum focus distance is about 40 inches. The disadvantage of using a telephoto is that you need to be further away with a longer focal length and therefore more prone to camera shake. In the photo below, I boosted the ISO to 400 so I would shoot at a faster shutter speed to compensate.

Now, I'm debating on getting the Sony FE 90 mm macro lens for my A7M3. I'm a little hesitant because it costs $1,100. Anything less than 90 mm will bring you too close to the subject and block the light, so the 50 mm macro is off my list.

(Sony A6300, 55-210 mm E-Mount at 210 mm, f/6.3, 1/800 sec, ISO 400)

John

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Pieter Experienced

Pieter

Posted
Posted

Did you consider the new Sigma 70mm macro? It's half the price of the Sony. On your A7iii it may be too wide for you but if you put it on your a6300 it'll give you an equivalent view of a 105mm on fullframe, with added depth of field (something useful in macro photography). Personally I am using a +5 dioptre achromat front lens on my 55-210 for the occasional macro photo, giving me over 1:1 magnification at 210 mm. Very cheap alternative, though at the cost of a bit of IQ and working distance is about 10 cm at maximum magnification. And it's very front-heavy, making it difficult to mount steadily on a tripod.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • XKAES
      2 Primes or 1 Zoom?

      By XKAES · Posted

      I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Rodney G
      7 IV suddenly stopped connecting with Mac

      By Rodney G · Posted

      Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • bs.shoots
      2 Primes or 1 Zoom?

      By bs.shoots · Posted

      I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...