Jump to content

Recommended Posts

`   

  

No mention in the OP of the current approach 

to focusing for astro.  

   

My suggested solution is to NOT use any fast 

zoom lens when a top quality older MF prime 

WITH a solid infinity stop costs less than the 

lens hood for that fast zoom. Common sense ?  

   

   

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on which camera body you're using, and your focus settings, you may see a distance scale on the LCD screen or in the viewfinder when you focus. I know I get one on the A7RII with that same lens. The technique that's worked very well for me is to turn the focus barrel from a near distance setting just barely until the ∞ symbol appears. Of course, that's assuming you don't have anything bright enough to visually focus on. Another tip: visually focus at 70mm, and then adjust the zoom setting (e.g., to 24mm) and the focus is retained. You may find that temporarily setting the ISO very high (e.g., maximum for your camera) helps with focusing, then set ISO back to your preferred value before shooting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t know what ‘OP’ means,

 

I don’t know about common sense either

 

where’s the point in buying another lens when

I already have this fantastic one .   

 

If you can’t offer constructive help then don’t

bother replying.

   

Apparently you don't know much. And 

this reply is constructive help. Use it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

You really do need to manually focus in this situation, but with long lenses you can't rely on marking on the lens or in the camera.  You need to do it visually -- and you gotten some mostly helpful suggestions.  Focusing on the moon is great -- if it's available.  Two more tips.  Make sure the diopter adjustment for your viewfinder is correct for your sight FIRST.  Also, consider buying a viewfinder magnifier -- Minolta made several that fit on Sony cameras (Sony bought Minolta).  I use a Minolta AngleFinder VN on my a850 which has 1X and 2X magnification.  Minolta made other magnifiers as well -- a whole lot cheaper than a new lens!

Also use a good tripod and cable release/remote.

And for the best results, stop down -- but that depends on the lens and the situation.

And if you like the results, you might decide on a longer lens, but most of my best star shots were taken with wide-angle lenses and some foreground in the picture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...