Jump to content

Recommended Posts

`    

    

Legacy lenses are for 24x36mm format. Your camera 

is 16x24 format. The solution is a SpeedBooster, aka 

"focal reducer", aka "reverse tele-extender". You put 

something in the affordable 17 to 20mm range onto a 

SpeedBooster and you maintain 95% of the FoV plus 

lens speed at every stop is one stop faster. 

   

Ever notice that when you move a projector closer to 

a screen/wall to shrink the image size, that the image 

gets brighter and brighter, while getting smaller and

smaller ?  

   

A SpeedBooster uses its optics, instead of a physical 

change of distance, to shrink the image that the lens 

is projecting toward the sensor ... but the principle of 

"smaller makes brighter" still pertains. Thaz how each 

f-stop becomes twice as bright.  

   

Due to the relay optics nature of SpeedBoosters, they 

are physically a few mm shorter than an ordinary non-

optical [empty tube] adapter. Seems like a win-win, so 

there hasta be a catch, which is price :-(  

  

But, thaz the price. There's no really wide FoV legacy 

lens for APSC cuz, again, legacy lenses were made 

for a larger format. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

`   

   

So something like a metabones is my only hope for getting a

great wide angle

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

    

You say you've been collecting legacy lenses for a coupla years. 

So that means there is one other option. Perhaps that collection  

justifies acquiring an a7 or a7-II body. 

  

For my use, APSC has only the slightest advantage over FF, so 

the only reason I have one FF Sony [i have 4 APSC Sonys] is to  

make use of my pile of cool lenses left over from the film era. All 

film lenses [OK, 99.9% of them] are acoarst FF lenses. 

   

Initially I used my Nikkors on APSC Sonys via a SpeedBooster, 

and I still do that. But I also wanted to use all my old Minolta AF 

lenses and Sony has very appealing adapters for them, but they 

have no focal reducing optics in them, so to use the full FoV of 

those lenses you need a FF body ... even tho these adapters do

function perfectly on the smaller bodies.   

   

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the long term plan, as far as finances allow. The short term was to get hold of the widest lens available in the prime lenses, something that even with the 1.6X magnification factor would give awesome wide angle.

 

The lowest I've found is 12mm lenses (19.2mm with crop factor), even of these i have no idea which ones are good

 

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure you have a Sony, not a Canon? Because Sony's APS-C crop factor is 1.5, Canon is 1.6.

 

Anyway, adapting legacy wides is not such a good idea as modern lenses are just so much better. There's a very nice modern Samyang 12mm and it's affordable. It's sold under various different names around the world, you should look into that.

 

If you're also not rectilinear wideangles, there are also a few fisheyes available. As far as I know you get the widest angle of view with the Meike 6.5mm which is a circular fisheye that can actually see slightly behind itself (190° diagonal).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Like Miran, I would advise against adapting legacy wide angle lenses. Ultra wide lenses were difficult and expensive to manufacture until recent years. So the legacy ultra wide angle lenses are also rare, expensive and not very good.

 

You seem to have been looking at the newer manual lenses with native E mount, like Samyang. That's probably your best bet. If you want better quality than the kitlens but not necessarily a wider field of view, then there are a few options like Sony 20 or Sigma 19. You could also look for a used copy of the Sony 10-18.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Speaking of rectalinear glass I got Laowa 12mm f2.8, with focal reducer it's 8.5mm and works fine, just lean a bit forward to avoid your shoes in the picture. There's also Irix 11mm (7.8mm with focal reducer) which should be good thou I have not tried one. Viltrox makes a good focal reducer at fraction of the price of Metabones..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Digital sensors do not suffer from reciprocity failure in the way film does, they are linear. Cameratose's suggestion is the most likely. Also with such long exposures, there could be subtle changes in lighting levels between the two shots taken at seperate times, that the human eye could not perceive.
    • I can only speak of the A7c. I owned a A7 and a A6000 but wanted a silent shutter mode for street, so opted for a A7c. Combined with a 35mm prime lens it is wonderful for what I bought it for. The newer larger capacity battery is also great. But the thing that blew me away, was one evening I photographed a fast moving night event. I was shooting at 16000 ISO to freeze the movement. I was blown away by how good the images were, sure there was grain in the shadows but in no way was it offputting. The previous year I had shot the same event at 8000 ISO on my A7, and the results were way too grainy for my liking. The build quality of the A7c is really good, whilst small it feels strong and rugged. It does have it's downsides though: The view through the viewfinder is small compared to the A7 and sometimes on detailed street scenes from a distance it can be difficult to pick things out through the viewfinder (I can't use the rear display, I would need to keep putting reading glasses on  ). As someone has mentioned, it can be too small for some, they are not very tall and with big hands the last two fingers may have nowhere to go I imagine (not a problem for me). I have just bought a Sony 24-105 F4 G lens to go with mine and it does feel "all lens" on the A7c, that doesn't bother me, probably because I used to own a Sony Cybershot DSC-F717 which was "all lens" and I loved it's handling. You sort of devlop a technique where you hold the lens and steady the body rather than the other way around. If you can, goto a dealer and try them all out. I would recommend trying different lenses on each to see how they handle (small compact, long thin and medium stubby). I am sure you will be pleased with whichever you go for.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...