beunky Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Does anyone have any thoughts about which lens would be better at 200 mm for a Sony A6300 now and a A7-something later? I don't need it for anything other than 200 mm, so the versatility of a zoom is not a pro for me. I'm just wondering which one would give me better image quality when used for mostly landscape and some architecture. I have a preference for primes due to high quality combined with relatively low weight, but I also prefer native e-mount lenses... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 18, 2017 Posted February 18, 2017 Hi beunky, Take a look here Canon 200 2.8 or Sony 70-200 F4. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tinplater Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 I have the Sony 70-200 F4 and it produces wonderfully sharp and beautifully rendered images on my a7rii and a6000. However, if you shoot on a tripod, the Canon 200mm would offer better bokeh and possibly sharper images. A big minus, at this FL is the absence of IS on the Canon. If I were to choose just one lens, I would sacrifice the aperture speed and go with the Sony. It will focus faster also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Username Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 70-210/4 is the most evolved/perfected zoom. 40 years progress fine honing a design whose spec never really pushed the envelope in the first place. I'm not praising Sony's lens. I'm referring to a genre. Any 70-210/4 by a major maker. 70-210/4 has essentially become equal to any prime. It's the standard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beunky Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share Posted February 20, 2017 Thanks for the input guys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest all8 Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 This was done with the 70-200f4 @ 200mm, I think its good enough, and I would certainly not want to spend anytime with an adapted lens. https://500px.com/photo/196176409/cabo-peñas-light-tower-by-tim-rule Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beunky Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 That's really nice, thanks. Looks like a good choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baiwei Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I've studied this matter for some time. Sony's own 70-200/4 OSS is WAY too expensive. It really should cost alot less. A few days ago I've bought myself a Canon 70-200/4 L USM (with no IS as I have it in A7II), Used lens in perfect condition costs like 350USD here in Russia. The lens produces perfectly sharp pictures with nice bokeh and works perfectly on Viltrox NEX-EF adapter - AF is fast an spot on. And the lens itself is rather light and comfortable to handle. I definitely recommend this lens. Samples: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.sonyalphaforum.com/topic/6848-canon-200-28-or-sony-70-200-f4/?do=findComment&comment=31503'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now