Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello

I made a quick review of the Minolta MC 58/1.2 against the Sony FE 55/1.8 ZA on the Sony A7r.

Please let me know what you think.

 

https://beautifullenses.wordpress.com/2015/04/18/minolta-mc-58-1-2/

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool. By f/4 they are, for most real applications, equal,

but at f/1.2 the new lens is just ... uhmnnn ... nowhere ! 

  

I prefer photographs that look like photographs. I don't

need a "2D facsimile" of reality. Reality is [usually] the

physical subject in front of the lens, but being physical

is cannot be rammed thru the glass and splattered all

over the sensor [or film]. 

  

Only light, modulated by the physical subject, makes it

thru the glass, and forms an image ... AN IMAGE, not

a replica. Not a cell-for-cell clone. Not a brick-for-brick

recreation with working fireplace and outhouse. I want

a 'photo'-'graph' of the subject. A 'light'-'picture' of the

subject ... and HONEST photographs LOOK like what

they really are ... pictures. Sorry about the shouting. I

get carried away a bit :-) 

  

Anywho thanks for the comparison. Restores my faith. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the 58 1.2 but I sold it just because the 50mm 1.4 is just 15% of the Price but 100% of the performance just without the little step in extra light but with a far better sharpness wide open. There is really no point for the 1.2 lens expect the "must have" feeling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Yes, except for the "must have feeling." 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That MC 58/1.2 is a beautiful lens for sure. I had one for a few weeks and enjoyed using it on my A7ii. After some informal testing, I found that it was not quite as sharp as my Hexanon 50/1.4, and the OOF blurring and Bokeh was also better on the Hex 50/1.4. I would have kept the 58 just for f/1.2 fun, but the weight of it was a big downside. Like attaching a bowling ball to the A7ii.

 

All with A7ii at f/1.2

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...