Jump to content

Minolta MD Rokkor 85 mm 1.7

Recommended Posts




Bought this lens , brand new, out of the shop, years ago, in Osnabrük Germany.

Initially it was on a minolta  XE 1, but that died in the  1980s

Apparently the Minolta  XE 1 was the worst ever, camera, to repair  ??   So I was told, Anyway the lens is still going strong & I recently had it refurbished for  £ 200.  

Anyone interested ?  Make me an offer !

Remember !  This is a  Rare Lens !   Only made for a year or so, but the replacement was never as  sharp or as good in low light !

Edited by Wally The Confused
additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...


You certainly are confused.  The Minolta 85mm f1.7 is, as you say, a great lens -- I have one -- but it is not rare, and was made for many years.  But it is pretty expensive.  There were actually three versions of the 85mm f1.7 lens, but the optics were always the same:


Minolta also made 85mm lenses with f2.0 and f2.8 apertures.  One was a soft-focus lens with adjustable spherical aberration.  All of them are winners, and selling prices range from $100 to $500 depending on the model and condition.

Good luck with your sale -- and feel free to use any information from my Minolta website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • hello... I got this info in different youtube vids, but watch the end of this one where they go into the video review of the A7RV... I would gladly post examples, but dont have access to any of those lenses. I'm asking this because I'm trying to figure out what the min. focal length I would need so that when cropped in for APSC and the rest, that it would still be wide enough. If I don't shoot APSC, I can get away w/ a less wide lens, but then I guess the quality goes down, sharpness, rolling shutter, etc.
    • Can you detail more on what aspects will benefit from APS-C mode? Never heard of this before and I am really curious. The corners of the sensor are the hardest to stabilize since they are moving the most trying to smooth out our hand movement, so by cropping into the sensor you take the corners out of the equation, which might yield better results, not sure about it, but worth a try. Can you make a quick comparison test with a 24mm vs a 16mm cropped in test and post it here? It would be very interesting to see your results.
    • I've been reading that the quality is better in APS-C mode ,but I'm finding that w/ my lenses, I'm not able to get in tighter spaces with the 1.5x crop, not to mention adding crop for active steady shot, focus breathing, etc. (which aren't as significant as APS-C). If I don't shoot APS-C, what am I losing? How much better is APS-C mode and in what way? I have to decide if to film normally or to rent/borrow a wider angle lens so that after cropping I can still have a wide enough lens for the shot. e.g. is it better to film w/ a 24mm lens not cropped, or a 16 or 20mm lens and crop in. Which has better quality or is it negligible? I heard also something to do w/ electronic rolling shutter is better w/ aps-c. what about stabilization, etc. Pros and cons? Thanks!
  • Topics

  • Create New...