Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello

I made a quick review of the Minolta MC 58/1.2 against the Sony FE 55/1.8 ZA on the Sony A7r.

Please let me know what you think.

 

https://beautifullenses.wordpress.com/2015/04/18/minolta-mc-58-1-2/

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool. By f/4 they are, for most real applications, equal,

but at f/1.2 the new lens is just ... uhmnnn ... nowhere ! 

  

I prefer photographs that look like photographs. I don't

need a "2D facsimile" of reality. Reality is [usually] the

physical subject in front of the lens, but being physical

is cannot be rammed thru the glass and splattered all

over the sensor [or film]. 

  

Only light, modulated by the physical subject, makes it

thru the glass, and forms an image ... AN IMAGE, not

a replica. Not a cell-for-cell clone. Not a brick-for-brick

recreation with working fireplace and outhouse. I want

a 'photo'-'graph' of the subject. A 'light'-'picture' of the

subject ... and HONEST photographs LOOK like what

they really are ... pictures. Sorry about the shouting. I

get carried away a bit :-) 

  

Anywho thanks for the comparison. Restores my faith. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the 58 1.2 but I sold it just because the 50mm 1.4 is just 15% of the Price but 100% of the performance just without the little step in extra light but with a far better sharpness wide open. There is really no point for the 1.2 lens expect the "must have" feeling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Yes, except for the "must have feeling." 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That MC 58/1.2 is a beautiful lens for sure. I had one for a few weeks and enjoyed using it on my A7ii. After some informal testing, I found that it was not quite as sharp as my Hexanon 50/1.4, and the OOF blurring and Bokeh was also better on the Hex 50/1.4. I would have kept the 58 just for f/1.2 fun, but the weight of it was a big downside. Like attaching a bowling ball to the A7ii.

 

All with A7ii at f/1.2

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Shooting a cactus flower is probably where you do want to have nice bokeh. I can't recall which camera you're shooting, or maybe you haven't said, but using live view you can see what the shot will look like before you press the button. Try setting up on a flower or something stationary where you can control the background and see the changes different settings make. 
    • That's what I got from your post here: When shooting at f/11, bokeh is indeed not something you should be concerned with, unless when shooting closeup. Nearly all lenses have a polygonal iris shape at f/11 which naturally gives a more edgy rendering of out of focus areas. @Cameratose's example is perfect for demonstrating the relevance of bokeh. To some extent you can influence the backdrop of a shot, but if it is busy foliage relatively close by, it'd better not be distracting from your subject. Some lenses are able to create a more pleasing background than others, even at the same aperture setting and focal length. For the impact of the entire image one might even argue that the smoothness of the background is as relevant as the sharpness of the subject.
    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...