christer Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 I made a test today to establish whether it would make any difference to the picture quality if IS is on or off when the camera is on a tripod. (It has been suggested, but now I exaggerate, that IS would almost run berserk if switched on with the camera on tripod.) The simple answer is that it makes no difference to the image quality if IS is on or off when the camera is on a tripod. My test method: I used an A7r2 and shot RAW @ 100 ISO. I used a 55mm Sonnar and a 85mm Batis at f/8. The Sonnar does not have in-lens IS, but the Batis has. Exposure time was 1/5s and I shot a USAF chart placed at a distance of 30x the focal length (to make the chart the same size on the sensor irrespective of focal length). I made ten shot for each variant (Batis with IS on and off; and the same for the Sonnar), a total of 40 shots. I used Capture One to open the RAWs, sharpened slightly and adjusted exposure a little bit and compared at 100% on my Retina screen using a large reading glass. (At this aperture, there was no relevant difference between Sonnar and Batis.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 6, 2016 Posted March 6, 2016 Hi christer, Take a look here Tripod and Image Stabilizer (IS). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest all8 Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 You will not see it with the USAF chart. Need to take a photo of something with a fine textured surface, such as large rocks. christer 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christer Posted March 6, 2016 Author Share Posted March 6, 2016 You will not see it with the USAF chart. Need to take a photo of something with a fine textured surface, such as large rocks. Will do. And report back. Thanks timde! https://500px.com/nix-pix Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisqphoto Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 micro-jitter is what you are looking for. christer 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
C47 Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 The simple answer is that it makes no difference to the image quality if IS is on or off when the camera is on a tripod.Because in most cases the camera realizes it when it's on a tripod and automatically turns off IS. Sent from my Aquaris X5 using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golem Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 You will not see it with the USAF chart. Need to take a photo of something with a fine textured surface, such as large rocks. Man speaks truth. I was shooting some textile and forgot to turn of the IBIS. Couldn't figger out why the "edge" was off of the sharpness. I will not specify the exact lens in use, nor the tonnage of my tripod. Suffice it to say that these items are toadally immune from blame for any compromising of IQ. I will also not recite my "test conditions". Fugdat. This is a Real World situation, Then, I looked at an image with silk screening on the cloth. The screen ink makes tiny little micro-highlights. Seen under magnification, the micro-highlights were all elongated, and all in the same direction ! This told me the IBIS was streaking the image. Acoarst I turned it off and dope slapped myselves. Problem solved. ..... in most cases the camera realizes it when it's on a tripod and automatically turns off IS. OK. I am very distrustful of most automatic functions. I admit my IBIS is set to the lens FL, not to "Auto". Since the lens in use is not coupled electronically to the camera, I really can't set the IBIS to "Auto" anywho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now