Everybody!
No cables-
On you a6000 camera, go into MENU- Playback-View Mode-Folder View (MP4)
You can now see and select the movies that you want to transfer.
Then simply go to Wireless-Send to Smartphone-This Image- (even though it says 'This Image', it will transfer the Video file you are currently stopped at. Then of course connect to the Camera wifi access point on your iPhone, then. use your 'Imaging Edge Mobile' app and touch 'Start' ( which should be orange) and it tr
Sounds like you need a manual, and you are correct different settings can affect what you can do in the drive more.
Did you simple press the DRIVE button and select the THREE rectangles?
There are several "burst" modes -- that you set with the Fn button or DRIVE button. One takes several photos, when you press the button once (CONTINUOUS). Another requires you to press the shutter button each time (SINGLE). When you press the DRIVE button, what icon shows up -- a single rectangle or three?
If the 18-105 is too bulky, then so is the Tamron 17-70. Quality wise however, definately pick the Tamron over the Sony Zeiss 16-70, which is a compromised and dated design and similar in quality to the 18-105. I was in the same boat as you for a while (also had the 16-50 kit lens and 18-105 f/4), and went with the Sony 16-55 F/2.8 G. Happy with the choice as it's more compact than the Tamron 17-70 and vastly better quality than the Zony 16-70. In your case however, the omission of stabilized optics might be a dealbreaker. Did you consider the tiny but decent Sigma 18-50 f/2.8?
As the title itself suggests, I am torn between the two options.
The camera is a 6300 and the need is for a do it (almost) everything lens for some business trips on airline hand luggage in which I am limited to one camera and one lens since I will do some landscape and urban shooting in the spare time between business commitments. I will not use it for videos.
I have the Sony 18-135 and the 15-50 kit, but they are too slow around 24-35 mm, which are the focal lengths I use the most.
I can live with /f 4, as long as sharpness widen open is acceptable.
The price difference between the two lenses is marginal, basically zero for me, because the Sony 16-70 is slightly more expensive but I don't need to buy additional filters, as I can use the 18-135 UV and polarizer. I have tried the 18-105 G /f 4 Sony but it was disappointedly soft and too bulky.
Recommended Posts
Posted by Hulswit Media,
0 reactions
Go to this post
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now