Jump to content

How was your transition to Sony from other camera brands?


Recommended Posts

Hi all - curious former Canon user here, new to the forum!

I love my mirrorless Sony A7 IV - I use it for both video and stills and yes, it's a different beast than my former Canon EOS 5D Mark IV for sure. The image quality is out of this world! It took some time to get used to the interface for me, personally but now that I'm used to it (didn't take long), I love it. 

I'm just curious about other's experiences in going from Canon or Nikon to Sony, if any, and any tips for using the A7 in general as a new user (I'm just a few weeks in!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Thank you Pieter! That's great input, I remember going to visiting stores before purchasing and you're right, it seemed most mirrorless cameras I had a look at seemed like great options overall. I decided to go with Sony for a few reasons, one of them being a good friend of mine in the product photography field has been using Sony only for ages. Another reason was the way Sony did indeed seem quite welcoming to 3rd party lenses, that is important to me.

Appreciate your time and comment!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Transition, what transition?  I wanted a full frame body for the longest time but all of them were out of my reach new or used, until I found an A7II kit which had less than 100 shutter actuation on consignment at a local camera shop and I jumped on it.  With a lens register distance of 18mm for the Sony E mount bodies meant that I can use just about all of the legacy lenses ever produced let me continue to use my accumulated K mount lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got back into photography after an 8 year break. Before that  I've been a Pentax fan since 1978. I have a bunch of Pentax glass and bodies , both film and digital. When I started back up last year I bought a used Pentax K1 II. I soon realized that it's autofocus system was dated. I then decided to switch to a Sony mirrorless system. I also bought a Monster Adapter to use the Pentax glass on the Sony. I think I can use about 5 of my more expensive Pentax lenses. So far I'm very pleased with the switch to Sony.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made the move from Canon DSLR  (5D MKIV) to Canon mirrorless (R6) keeping the DSLRs just in case. I was very disappointed with the R6 so I part exchanged it for an A7 IV. After a week using this camera I was so impressed that I packed up all my Canon kit and  part exchanged it for a second A7 IV and a range of lenses and accessories. Now one year later I am still delighted with the change. The move from Canon to Sony was not as easy as the move from Canon DSLR to Canon mirrorless. The main reason for say this is the menu structure of the Sony is so completely different to the Canon structure. Once you understand it and the different terminology, there is no problem. The camera layout is no quite as straightforward but again once you are used to it there is no problem. The most important factor for me is the overall performance of the camera. The Sony is superb, great, super reliable autofocus, high image quality, first class in body stabilisation, light weight and support for great lenses both Sony and a huge range of third party lenses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2024 at 9:43 PM, Pieter said:

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Funnily enough, Canon DSLRs and the EF mount might have been the inspiration for the "open" E mount. There are a lot of third party lenses for EF mount, even if they did have to reverse-engineer some of it. Unlike the E mount, though, there are third party teleconverters for EF mount.

I was a Canon shooter for quite a while, and I found little problem switching to Sony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all! This has turned into an interesting thread to read through - I guess the overall takeaway is that the transition seems to be quite minimal, and if anything its the interface / terminology that differs but yeah, its easy to get used to it really. I've been shooting this weekend (I got started with some product photography for my friends hobby company selling baby toys, it was fun!) and yeah, I love my Sony. 😍

Link to post
Share on other sites

I transitioned from Nikon DSRL to Sony for weight reasons, but I still use my Nikon equipment when bulk and weight are not an issue. The main issue was learning a new menu system, i.e. knowing what to do but not knowing where the option to do it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 5/7/2024 at 12:35 AM, Phormula said:

I transitioned from Nikon DSRL to Sony for weight reasons, but I still use my Nikon equipment when bulk and weight are not an issue. The main issue was learning a new menu system, i.e. knowing what to do but not knowing where the option to do it was.

The big issue for me is that Nikon lenses turn the opposite way to mount and dismount - that took some getting used to, and I still got it wrong sometimes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2024 at 11:55 PM, FunWithCameras said:

The big issue for me is that Nikon lenses turn the opposite way to mount and dismount - that took some getting used to, and I still got it wrong sometimes!

Actually now I have the problem more the other way round, i.e. when I use my old Nikon stuff. With the Sony I tend to change lenses much less, because I am using zooms and because changing the lens in the field is a recipe for hours of photoshopping if a grain of dust finds its way on the sensor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Late to the party, but for me it was no big deal having shot Minolta Maxxums in film days. The early Sonys I had like the A700 and A350 (Still have that one) had Minolta's DNA all over them. I moved to M-4/3 for a while and had a Sony SLT-65A (hated the SLT tech) but eventually decided I needed better low-light performance for what I shoot and pre-ordered an A7 IV. 

The A7 IV was accompanied by an A7R III for a backup. It was interesting using two different menu systems at the same time, and was probably a bigger challenge than switching entire systems. It took a few weeks to sort the R III out and commit things to memory but once I did it was second nature. I eventually sold the R III and now both of my main cameras have the same menu. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • How are you liking your ZV-E10?  Do you use it for still photography, video or both?  I would enjoy hearing your feedback! The A33 was my first digital ILC (interchangeable lens camera) and I still use it a good bit for when I am taking photos specifically for posting online.
    • Hello guys, here I share my impressions of the Brightin Star 11mm 2.8 fisheyelens for night photography, and share some photos taken with it at the end of the post.   Introduction The Brightin Star 11mm 2.8 is a fisheye lens, with manual focus, which is available for different mounts, including Sony's E mount. It is a very interesting lens because of its focal length, large aperture and price - it currently costs just 213 euros (https://brightinstar.com/products/brightin-star-11mm-f2-8-full-frame-wide-angle-starry-sky-fisheye-lens-suitable). After some time using it with the Sony A7IV, here are my impressions of using it. Construction The construction of the lens is excellent; it is a tremendously robust lens, made primarily of metal. It weighs about 600 grams but, even so, it has a contained size compared to its competitors (such as the Samyang or the Astrhori 12mm 2.8). Its diaphragm ring, which is located on the front of the lens, has no clicks. Behind it is the focus ring, and it is followed by a (focusing) scale that is a great help when shooting at large apertures, especially at f2.8. The construction of the lens is generally very good.     Image Quality The image quality of the Brightin Star 11mm 2.8 surprised me. It is a lens that, despite its price, is super sharp, especially in the center of the image. That sharpness drops off, as expected, in the corners. And although its sweet spot is at f5.6 to f8, it performs very well at f2.8, which makes it an ideal lens for night photography. As for vignetting, it is present at full aperture, and fades (without disappearing completely) as the aperture closes. As for chromatic aberrations, they are significantly present, but are easily correctable in processing. Regarding other distortions, it has the fisheye distortion, and some coma in the corners at full aperture. Finally, as for flares, I did not notice any special flare in the presence of lateral light sources. All in all, image quality is a plus for this lens.   Sunstar Another of the lens' strong points, in addition to its sharpness, is the sunstar it creates. This sunstar appears easily from f4. It is 8-bladed and very beautiful. This is a feature to take into account as it can be used as another element to compose with when photographing the sun, the moon or some other point of light in our night photography.   Use Due to its 2.8 aperture and the good performance at it, the Brightin Star 11mm 2.8 is a very interesting lens for night photography. Personally I have used it mostly for floors, combined with a longer focal length (previous pictures) to get the milky way in more detail. But even so, because of its wide angle of view, I have also found it useful for panoramas, since with just 6 vertical shots you can cover 240 degrees.   Conclusion The Brightin 11mm 2.8 is a very economical fisheye lens that performs very well in both landscape and night photography, both for simple shots (correcting its distortion) and for panoramas. It stands out, above all, for its build quality, performance at full aperture and for its beautiful sunstar that comes out easily from f4.   I got it at the official website: https://brightinstar.com/products/brightin-star-11mm-f2-8-full-frame-wide-angle-starry-sky-fisheye-lens-suitable-for-l-sony-e-nikon-z-canon-rf-mount?srsltid=AfmBOor8dl4EwqFJ5z6IUvL5VPiwkVKfjhW0r90r8MDCQR6AscZER9j0   Here I share some photos taken with it (the first two, only the foreground was tanken with it; the thrid one, all the photos of the panorama were taken with it).  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...