Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all - curious former Canon user here, new to the forum!

I love my mirrorless Sony A7 IV - I use it for both video and stills and yes, it's a different beast than my former Canon EOS 5D Mark IV for sure. The image quality is out of this world! It took some time to get used to the interface for me, personally but now that I'm used to it (didn't take long), I love it. 

I'm just curious about other's experiences in going from Canon or Nikon to Sony, if any, and any tips for using the A7 in general as a new user (I'm just a few weeks in!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Thank you Pieter! That's great input, I remember going to visiting stores before purchasing and you're right, it seemed most mirrorless cameras I had a look at seemed like great options overall. I decided to go with Sony for a few reasons, one of them being a good friend of mine in the product photography field has been using Sony only for ages. Another reason was the way Sony did indeed seem quite welcoming to 3rd party lenses, that is important to me.

Appreciate your time and comment!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Transition, what transition?  I wanted a full frame body for the longest time but all of them were out of my reach new or used, until I found an A7II kit which had less than 100 shutter actuation on consignment at a local camera shop and I jumped on it.  With a lens register distance of 18mm for the Sony E mount bodies meant that I can use just about all of the legacy lenses ever produced let me continue to use my accumulated K mount lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got back into photography after an 8 year break. Before that  I've been a Pentax fan since 1978. I have a bunch of Pentax glass and bodies , both film and digital. When I started back up last year I bought a used Pentax K1 II. I soon realized that it's autofocus system was dated. I then decided to switch to a Sony mirrorless system. I also bought a Monster Adapter to use the Pentax glass on the Sony. I think I can use about 5 of my more expensive Pentax lenses. So far I'm very pleased with the switch to Sony.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made the move from Canon DSLR  (5D MKIV) to Canon mirrorless (R6) keeping the DSLRs just in case. I was very disappointed with the R6 so I part exchanged it for an A7 IV. After a week using this camera I was so impressed that I packed up all my Canon kit and  part exchanged it for a second A7 IV and a range of lenses and accessories. Now one year later I am still delighted with the change. The move from Canon to Sony was not as easy as the move from Canon DSLR to Canon mirrorless. The main reason for say this is the menu structure of the Sony is so completely different to the Canon structure. Once you understand it and the different terminology, there is no problem. The camera layout is no quite as straightforward but again once you are used to it there is no problem. The most important factor for me is the overall performance of the camera. The Sony is superb, great, super reliable autofocus, high image quality, first class in body stabilisation, light weight and support for great lenses both Sony and a huge range of third party lenses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2024 at 9:43 PM, Pieter said:

I think the transition from a DSLR (your trusty EOS 5Div in this case) to a mirrorless system (be it Canon, Nikon or Sony) is a much bigger change than the change of camera brands. There are some differences between brands (notably: Sony being quite welcoming to 3rd party lens producers, difference in ergonomics (wrist angle, button layout, camera bulkiness), difference in AF system), but mostly all latest generation mirrorless cameras are great in their own regard.

Funnily enough, Canon DSLRs and the EF mount might have been the inspiration for the "open" E mount. There are a lot of third party lenses for EF mount, even if they did have to reverse-engineer some of it. Unlike the E mount, though, there are third party teleconverters for EF mount.

I was a Canon shooter for quite a while, and I found little problem switching to Sony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all! This has turned into an interesting thread to read through - I guess the overall takeaway is that the transition seems to be quite minimal, and if anything its the interface / terminology that differs but yeah, its easy to get used to it really. I've been shooting this weekend (I got started with some product photography for my friends hobby company selling baby toys, it was fun!) and yeah, I love my Sony. 😍

Link to post
Share on other sites

I transitioned from Nikon DSRL to Sony for weight reasons, but I still use my Nikon equipment when bulk and weight are not an issue. The main issue was learning a new menu system, i.e. knowing what to do but not knowing where the option to do it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 5/7/2024 at 12:35 AM, Phormula said:

I transitioned from Nikon DSRL to Sony for weight reasons, but I still use my Nikon equipment when bulk and weight are not an issue. The main issue was learning a new menu system, i.e. knowing what to do but not knowing where the option to do it was.

The big issue for me is that Nikon lenses turn the opposite way to mount and dismount - that took some getting used to, and I still got it wrong sometimes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2024 at 11:55 PM, FunWithCameras said:

The big issue for me is that Nikon lenses turn the opposite way to mount and dismount - that took some getting used to, and I still got it wrong sometimes!

Actually now I have the problem more the other way round, i.e. when I use my old Nikon stuff. With the Sony I tend to change lenses much less, because I am using zooms and because changing the lens in the field is a recipe for hours of photoshopping if a grain of dust finds its way on the sensor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Late to the party, but for me it was no big deal having shot Minolta Maxxums in film days. The early Sonys I had like the A700 and A350 (Still have that one) had Minolta's DNA all over them. I moved to M-4/3 for a while and had a Sony SLT-65A (hated the SLT tech) but eventually decided I needed better low-light performance for what I shoot and pre-ordered an A7 IV. 

The A7 IV was accompanied by an A7R III for a backup. It was interesting using two different menu systems at the same time, and was probably a bigger challenge than switching entire systems. It took a few weeks to sort the R III out and commit things to memory but once I did it was second nature. I eventually sold the R III and now both of my main cameras have the same menu. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I recently bought an A7RV after nearly 5 years with a Lumix S1. I gave myself plenty of time to find out where the must-have features from the Lumix were on the Sony - the Help Guide is invaluable here. Using the Disp[lay] button to cycle through the different display features took a while to work out, likewise finding how to show flashing[= overexposed]  highlights on the playback images.

Other differences lie outside the camaeras themselves. For example the card slots. Yes, both cameras can used SDs, but the Lumix also has an XQD slot whereas the Sony uses CF Express necessitating rather more outlay for the cards themselves and a reader.

Then there's replacing the flash as the contacts are different. I was using happily a Nissin i60A with the Lumix and part exhanged it against another (new) one with Sony fittings. Fortunately - and one reason I bought the Sony - it has a co-axial sync socket, so connecting it to studio lights whould be no different to before.

It's still early days for actual shooting, but initial test and results look OK and I'm getting used to where to find things in the menu without having to consult the Guide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm always puzzled why so many pricey cameras leave off a PC connection on the body.  Makes no sense to me.  Yes, I know it can be solved with an adapter, but it's like buying a car without headlights.  That's great for people who only drive during the day.  Just DUMB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XKAES said:

I'm always puzzled why so many pricey cameras leave off a PC connection on the body.  Makes no sense to me.  Yes, I know it can be solved with an adapter, but it's like buying a car without headlights.  That's great for people who only drive during the day.  Just DUMB.

Some don't use them. I haven't connected a camera to a PC for years. I use a card reader for shots, and if I did want to connect there's blue tooth, WiFi, etc. The lack of a hardwired connection doesn't seem to be hurting sales. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Cameratose said:

Some don't use them. I haven't connected a camera to a PC for years. I use a card reader for shots, and if I did want to connect there's blue tooth, WiFi, etc. The lack of a hardwired connection doesn't seem to be hurting sales. 

I'm not sure whether XKAES meant a connection to a PC (as you interpreted it) or a PC socket used for triggering flashes (The P C stands for Prontor-Compur) - the idea being that you can use that kind of PC socket to trigger the flash instead of replacing the flash as richardgb was complaining.

I have to say that I haven't used that kind of PC socket in quite a long time. I just replaced my flash trigger when I switched from Canon to Sony. Gave me a number of advantages that a PC socket would not (including a radio connection).

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FunWithCameras said:

I'm not sure whether XKAES meant a connection to a PC (as you interpreted it) or a PC socket used for triggering flashes (The P C stands for Prontor-Compur) - the idea being that you can use that kind of PC socket to trigger the flash instead of replacing the flash as richardgb was complaining.

I have to say that I haven't used that kind of PC socket in quite a long time. I just replaced my flash trigger when I switched from Canon to Sony. Gave me a number of advantages that a PC socket would not (including a radio connection).

Ah, could be. It's been quite a while since I've even thought about one. I rarely use flash at all, when I do it's simply shoe mount. I used to use the all the time with bracket flashes, I think I still have on for my Minolta Maxxum.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • From my records, Minolta made about 8500 85mm F 1.7 lenses bearing the MD badge. The MC-X version was slightly double that. So these are not that rare. I just saw an ad for a Limited Rare MD 45mm F2 lens ( Minolta made over a million of these) so the word rare is often used in a bizarre way. Seeing that the OP has a MD ROKKOR-X version and that he appears to have bought it from Europe is kind of unusual since the ROKKOR-X versions were to be sold exclusively in America. So in Europe, this lens naming was rare.  I think the confusion about a reworked version may come from the fact that during the MC-X era (1972-76), Minolta made numerous changes to their lens line-up. First they changed the lens Mount Index dot which was initially painted like their previous series of lenses but after about 1 year, they replaced this with a slightly larger diameter plastic bead. This change happened around the introduction of the X-1, XM, XK bodies. Then they removed the small Stop Down Levers that were on most lenses up to now around 1975 since their SR T and XK/XE bodies were now boasting a Stop down mechanism. Then a little later Minolta even removed the lens formula (in this case PG) designation from the lens markings. This may have caused people to believe there was some kind of modification to the lens when it was only a marking  change. Also around 1973-74 they decided to provide a different marking for lenses sold in America ( at least USA and Canada) to identify lenses sold on the grey market that was often cause for confusion with consumers buying a great deal they could not get repaired under warranty. Same applies to Bodies starting in the same era where  X-1 was for Asian market, XK for American market and X-M for rest of the world, then SR T 102 in America, SR T Super in Asia and SR T 303 in rest of the world. So you could find all of the following with their respective front markings: - MC-II: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL) This type has the hills and valleys metal focusing ring -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Painted Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X marking for the American market) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (Orange colored ROKKOR-X again for the American market) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (White colored ROKKOR-X ( iguess orange paint was getting too expensive) ) It was then replaced with the MD-II MD ROKKOR (X) 85mm F 2 There was no MD-I version of this lens and the same with a few lenses with large apertures ( 35mm F 1.8, 58mm F 1.2, 300mm F 4.5) since they had issues with the speed of the aperture mechanisms closing down for what was  a last minute check on XD/XD-7 and XD-11 bodies requiring stopping the lens down just prior to the shutter opening to ensure accurate exposure. Some late MC-X lenses may have had the modified aperture mechanism causing the confusion that there was an updated version but the optical formula seems to indicate there was no change.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • It could probably be used directly on the A7R ( or any other body using the Sony MIS shoe) in manual mode provided it can be positioned properly in spite of the zillion contacts Sony placed on these bodies at the front of the shoe which may prevent the shoe from making proper contact at the center. If proper central contact is not achieved, using a ADP-MAA adapter topped by a Minolta FS-1100 will do the trick. Tried it with older flashes like 360PX and a few others and it works. The issue with using it in Manual Mode is that due to the very short distances involved, calculating the proper aperture for correct exposure is a challenge. Add to this that the assist lights will not operate the way they were designed if at all.
    • I've found some great lenses that way too -- like a Tokina 24-200mm AF zoom on a Maxxum 5 for $20.  I sold the camera for $40 and kept the lens.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...