Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

quick question from a beginner - I've recently inherited an ancient (but near-mint) A100 from a relative. My first DSLR and a lot of fun so far. Point is, I've bought a couple of cheap lenses off Ebay, a Minolta AF and a Helios 44-2 (m42 mount) with adapter. Now the thing I've noticed is that when I mount the Helios, the camera takes much longer than usual to start up - about 5 seconds, with a whirring noise all along that seems to come from the lens mount. After that everything (lens and body) works as it's supposed to. Is that normal? Is it the AF screw struggling against the adapter, or what?

The adapter is a cheap, chipped one, also off Ebay, nothing fancy but it seems well made. Am I at risk of wrecking my new toy or just worrying over nothing? Any feedback much appreciated and apologies in advance if there is already a similar topic, I honestly couldn't find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to have an A100 once and a cheap M42 adapter and didn't notice such strange behaviour. It's possible that because you have a chipped adapter the camera thinks there's an AF lens behind it and wants to do something with it. I'm not sure but I think when an A100 (or similar camera) detects a lens it doesn't know about, it wants to turn the AF screw once from one end to the other in order to calibrate the AF system. And because the adapter of course doesn't have that, it takes a few seconds before the camera gives up with this calibration sequence. If there was no chip on the adapter, the camera would simply not know about it and wouldn't try to do anything. But that's just my guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Miran, thanks for your reply - it makes sense to me! I asked a friend last night who's been into photography for years (though he doesn't use Sony) and his explanation was more ore less the same. Now the real question is whether that's good for the AF screw in the long run... I guess the sensible thing to do is to get a non-chipped adapter and see what happens then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The shutter is always open on mirrorless. The first or front curtain closing starts the picture taking process, the second or rear curtain completes it. There is no 'shutter slit' That's why your A7 IV has the option to close the shutter on power-down. Shooting electronic shutter is handled 100% by the processor telling the camera when to start saving what the sensor sees and when to stop, in simple terms. I've shot SLR, DSLR, SLT, and mirrorless, and mirrorless is by far the best. I shoot film from time to time and still have a couple of old DSLRS, a Minolta Maxxum 5D and a Sony A350. I have gotten to seriously dislike optical viewfinders. I would never shoot SLT again. It may have been the predecessor to mirrorless, but it wasn't great technology.  The AF issue aside, I think you just need to spend more time with the mirrorless. I know a few guys who went back to DSLR for similar reasons, but they eventually ended up back in mirrorless. Since DSLR is going the way of the dinosaur, your options aren't many. Shoot older cameras or mirrorless.   
    • Maybe could help but I doubt that the camera will drive the lenses better. from fw 3.2 the AF was spectacular even with the Minolta 80-200, not even close to a77ii but i was expecting it to be quite lackluster. It was snappy and tracked cars moving at 30kmh towards me without an issue. It was when I updated to 4.0 when I felt like i had to get the Sigma lens, which offers roughly the same experience: good autofocus on slow objects, stays in place or back focused (especially back focusing) most of the shots. I've tried to see if you can downgrade the firmware, but I've seen negative results. ISO1250 and that's overexposed, iso800 and the detail remains. could be, since it's no SLT either you also need the shutter slit to be wide enough to let the sensor do autofocus. all in all I believe mirrorless cameras are a step back from dslr and SLT cameras The SLT A99II has proven to be the best autofocusing camera in the world and it still is, it's just that the gimmick of the mirrorless cameras can detect the eye of the subject and promise to obtain better action portraits because they focus on the eye or cockpit of the subject. Because of this I was going to go full onto the A7CII but when I read it can only do 1/4000 and has a single shutter curtain I really felt like that was two fundamental deal breakers. The lack of joystick also made me quack off but the A7IV joystick isn't joyful either, all in all I have realized that going from the A77II to the a7iv had just a single point for which was clear photos at iso 3200, because everything else is a serious downgrade: the battery life, the ergonomics, the button layout, the autofocus responsiveness, the shutter cycle duration (3ms for A77II and 5ms for A7IV) etc. I wanted an A99II (thus paying only half of what I had to pay to convert to E mount) but all the ones I've seen were outside the EU or in poor condition.
    • Man, that stinks. I still wouldn't give up on settings though. Have you tried doing a factory reset and starting from scratch? What about all of the firmware updates on the camera?  One other thing, you say you're shooting f/4 and 1/5000. That's pretty quick. What kind of ISO does that result in? These cameras need light to AF so they can see contrasts. Have you tried dropping the shutter to 1/2000, or even 1/1600? You'll gain a couple stops of light to the sensor. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...