Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, first time poster. 

I am getting back into photography and have chosen to stick with sony, I have a pretty old Sony A100 alpha on the A mount, I have a couple of lenses that are all AF enabled, a small 28-70 sony kit lens and a telefoto Minolta, so my thought was to get an a6000 body, and use A to E adapter to make use of the glass. Is this advisable? Will I get clear crisp imagines in this manner, I can't imagine these lenses would be classed as "too old" or would they? 

I'm trying to keep the initial cost down whilst I get back into things, after this i would be happy to spend a bit more. 

Happy for any advice or correct me if my thinking is wrong. Is the A6000 a decent place to begin? I also considered the A77 mk2, which has the A mount.

To add, my style of photography is mainly just portraits, family time photography, and some outdoor street stuff from time to time. 

Thanks! 

Edited by Hosh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not get an a-mount camera -- with the features you want?  There are lots to choose from.  Most are APS format, but there were four that are full-frame format.  To use a-mount lenses on e-mount cameras you need an adapter that depends on your a-mount lenses and e-mount camera.  They are not cheap, and can have limitations.  You can avoid all that by sticking to a-mount cameras -- which are usually inexpensive.  So are a-mount lenses!  

Here's a list:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sony_A-mount_cameras

Edited by XKAES
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bud

Thanks for your reply, the A77ii is one that has the A mount my friend hence why I am very much considering it, having looked more over a few days I may take this route, as you have said though it has an APS sensor, so Additionally as starter should I try to get one of those A mount cameras with full frame or Aps for starters would be good? I don't mind spending a little more to have a camera that I really "grow" into

Edited by Hosh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you are familiar with the APS format -- from your a100 -- you might want to stick with that format.  The four a-mount cameras that are full frame are great, but more expensive -- but so are the latest APS format a-mount cameras (but they have newer features).  The a700 is a winner in my book, but it may not have what you are looking for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The short answer is HDR is only going to do so much. Blown out highlights are blown out highlights. The good news is that Sony underrates their sensors. Most people I know tend to overexpose a stop or so. You can pull an awful lot of detail out of what appears to be blown out highs.   From another post: As near as I can tell, the last camera (at least FF) that included HDR was the A7 III. The A7R III has it, so do the A9 and A9 II. While I didn't check them all, the A7R IV, A7 IV, A7R V, A9 III, and A1 do not have in-camera HDR. They do have HLG, a single frame high dynamic setting, but it's only available in HEIF format.  Without knowing which Canon you're using; there's a good chance that a newer camera of almost any brand would surpass it in dynamic range. However, I wouldn't plan on achieving the kind of results you're seeking without putting some effort into processing, unless you put some time into really learning the camera's abilities and limitations.   
    • I'm in real estate and every shot has bright windows and dim interior corners in the same frame. I don't have time for post-production, so I'm not looking for any software suggestions. I simply want the automatic, in-camera bracketing of a camera with a great HDR mode. I'm not satisfied with the HDR results that my Canon produces. I'm willing to pay more for a good Sony to get as close as possible to real software exposure bracketing. I want a full-frame mirrorless camera. Questions: Do Sony cameras take 3 images at once in HDR mode? How many seconds does it delay between shots? (My Canon takes 3 fast shots, but is then disabled for 10 full seconds after every HDR shot to stitch together the 3 images. It's brutal.) Does anyone have any examples of a dim interior with sunny windows? Which Sony would be best for this? Or am I just expecting too much from an in-camera feature? Thanks so much everyone!
    • Thankyou Cameratose (& Advertisement). I'm very grateful. Regards. Terry
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...