Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A few years ago I bought a Fotodiox adapter that fit on the NEX E mount and allowed me to use my Nikon lenses on the NEX, albeit without autofocus and metering.  It fit perfect on the NEX camera.


 


I know own an a7rii and before a worthwhile Nikon adapter is released was hoping to play around with some of my Nikon lenses on the new camera.


 


The Fotodiox adapter does not fit this camera.  It will allow me to mount it but it will not turn far enough to completely like in.


 


What am I missing here.  My E-mount APS-C lenses that I use on the NEX couple perfectly with the a7 but the adapter does not.  Is there any difference in the mounts between the NEX and the a7rii.  Shouldn't the adapter work?


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably it is just a matter of tolerances. The Sony stuff is (hopefully) built with stricter tolerances, while the adapter is not and when coupled with your particular camera it will not mount (but it will probably mount just fine on another A7r II).

 

It is like when we were trying to mount legacy glass on the Canon 5D: with the same lens some people needed to shave the mirror to mount it, while others didn't (but in that case the large tolerances were with the camera).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have the same problem with a tilt adapter, perfect on A6000 but won't rotate to click on A7RII.....strange !!!

Seeing this I don't have the courage to order other nikon to sony tilt adaptors...any (real) suggestions ? 10x

 

If you mean a tilt adapter probably your only option (beside stacking, that it's what I do these days instead of using a tilt adapter if the scene is stationary enough) are the Mirex adapter (use Google translate, the site is in German). I've not personally used one of these, but everyone I've heard of that does has been satisfied, and given the hefty cost (around 400€) they should be pretty good quality-wise.

 

BTW, with these you will need to use medium format glass, not Nikon one.

 

http://www.mirex-adapter.de/tilt_shift_adapter.htm

 

If you just mean a normal adapter instead, I've been pretty happy with this particular brand of Chinese adapters (around 10€):

 

http://www.sonyalphaforum.com/topic/384-a-good-brand-of-cheap-chinese-adapters/

 

By the way, in the post I mentioned some (really minor) trouble with light leaks; since then I've ordered another 4 of these, for different lens mounts, and the tolerances seems to be better because I cannot detect any light leaks anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...