Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Should the front curtain shutter be turned on or off for fast moving wildlife such as birds, and other moving targets? Should it be turned on or off for landscape photos?

I have an A7RIV and an A6600

John

Edited by DrJohn
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the smaller sensor size of the a6600 would not need the front curtain for either types of shots. I’ve never used it on my 24MB a9.

The larger sensor of the A7 may require it if you have live view off and a very large aperture lens that has to step down when the shutter is pressed. 

i don’t think there is a single right answer as it depends on the type of shot, lens, etc.

I don’t know if either camera has the e-front curtain, that option may be better as it eliminates one shutter activation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LiveShots said:

I think the smaller sensor size of the a6600 would not need the front curtain for either types of shots. I’ve never used it on my 24MB a9.

The larger sensor of the A7 may require it if you have live view off and a very large aperture lens that has to step down when the shutter is pressed. 

i don’t think there is a single right answer as it depends on the type of shot, lens, etc.

I don’t know if either camera has the e-front curtain, that option may be better as it eliminates one shutter activation.

I've been using the cameras with the front curtain on because that is the default. I haven't had any problems. But, I'm always exploring options.

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...