Jump to content

It’s Nikon’s fault that I’m here writing this....


Recommended Posts

I’ve been a Nikon shooter for 25+ years. For the past few years I resisted getting another manufacturers mirrorless camera in the hopes Nikon would come out with something of their own. After all, I had all the glass, right?  

Well, the day finally came and Nikon announced the Z6 and Z7. I put my order in right away and eventually got my camera.  Opening up the box and it was pure Nikon. Ergonomics were great. All the menus were what I was familiar with. Sure, it was missing some of the physical buttons I was used to , but I’ll assign what I need to the function buttons. I could live with that, I mean, the EFV was great, in camera stabilization great as well.  Picture quality was what you’d expect and finally the video was just as good as the stills.  

That’s where the high marks ended and where the problems (for me) began. The list of deal breakers wasn’t long, but the items on it were VERY heavily weighted. 

Focus acquisition and tracking: this was a real problem.  for years I had depended on Nikon’s 3D tracking.  How could they release something without it?  

Shutter blackout:  One of the first real shoots I had with this camera was shooting low level flying Jets. What I found was that the shutter blackout made it to where I was essentially counting on being able to maintain a steady pan (speed) and found I was pretty much using “The Force” to track the jet.  If I went off what I was seeing, or rather, the image flashed to me in the viewfinder, I was too late and simply couldn’t keep up.  I eventually got the hang of it, but found myself wondering why I should be guessing.  This should be better than what I’ve had for years already  

Back to the focus tracking.  When I encountered this I thought maybe it was me.  Maybe I wasn’t using the right “tracking” mode.  On the forums people said to use this mode or that one.  I tried all of them and it worked ok for say a moving car that took most of the viewfinder, but for something as simple as tracking my dog as he walked towards me, it just was so inconsistent that I couldn’t see keeping it.  How could I?  How could I justify keeping something that couldn’t do what my several year old D500 could do without missing a beat?

So, I had heard of this A9 from Sony.  I watched review after review on YouTube.  I marveled at the atimos footage showing the focusing sensors shimmering over a fast moving subject. I drooled when I saw there was zero blackout. After a few weeks that was it. The decision was made. I would buy the A9 and then sell all the Nikon gear I had. When I stopped to think about it, it didn’t matter that I had all the Nikon glass.  I knew I’d eventually get all the native Z-Mount lenses just like I would need to buy new glass for this new A9.  Also, I’ve been shooting long enough to know what I do and don’t need.  I simply don’t need all the lenses I had bought for my Nikons over the years.  So for starters I bought the 24-70 f/2.8 GM and the 70-200 f/2.8 GM.  Next up is the 24mm f/1.4 then we’ll see  we travel a lot so I prefer to keep the gear to a minimum.

So far the camera is amazing and it worked (and tracked) perfectly right out of the box.  If I change focus mode now it’s sinply a fine tuning, not a matter of it flat out working or not.   

I also found the camera quite intuitive.  Not sure if that just because I am so familiar with camera menu systems as a whole, but really, it hasn’t been that big a curve.  I also really like having my physical dials and buttons back. I wouldn’t mind a beefier camera body and the weather sealing could be better, but hey, overall, I couldn’t be happier with it.  

Gus M. | www.gm3sf.com |  IG: @GM3SF

Edited by gm3sf
Links
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had my a9 for a while now and I’m impressed with it every time I use it. The upcoming firmware updates  (if they are are good as Sony claim) will take the camera to a level far beyond what any other manufacturer has on the market.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Though I had been a Canon shooter for years, when I switched to Sony (a7r3 as I shoot mostly landscape) I found the "purge" of Canon glass to be quite refreshing.  The fact is that over the years I had acquired far more Canon glass than I needed.  Lots of overlaps.  Half of the lenses were very rarely used.  I went from 8 Canon lenses to 4 Sony lenses and actually came out ahead financially.  Yes, it took time but it was worthwhile.  And I also found the Sony to be different but after I spent the time establishing the Mode 1, 2 and 3 settings and the Fn menu I find the Sony very easy to use.  Enjoy yours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...