Jump to content

A7Rii 4k 60fps mode?

samneitzel

By samneitzel,
in Sony Alpha Video Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 6 months later...
DanArt Contributor

DanArt

Posted
Posted

Lets get something straight. It can shoot true 4K...not fake 4K from a phone. Even RED cameras have bigger issues ( like cropping files to 4gig ) then the SONY series do. Another issue ( even if you could get 60fps ) is over heating.

These cameras need heatsinks. Big video-cameras are big because they literally are giant heat-sinks to move the heat away from the camera.

That spot where the display pulls out could be used to apply a heatsink.

Then you could program 60FPS into it among other things.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
mirrorlessNY(youtuber) Enthusiast

mirrorlessNY(youtuber)

Posted
Posted
On 8/6/2019 at 4:21 PM, DanArt said:

Lets get something straight. It can shoot true 4K...not fake 4K from a phone. Even RED cameras have bigger issues ( like cropping files to 4gig ) then the SONY series do. Another issue ( even if you could get 60fps ) is over heating.

These cameras need heatsinks. Big video-cameras are big because they literally are giant heat-sinks to move the heat away from the camera.

That spot where the display pulls out could be used to apply a heatsink.

Then you could program 60FPS into it among other things.

agreed, wonder if those 4k 120fps rumors are true about a7siii

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • felipe
      Sony 16 mm f/1.8 G: Vea las primeras fotos tomadas

      By felipe · Posted

      Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • XKAES
      JPEG options?

      By XKAES · Posted

      I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • Cameratose
      JPEG options?

      By Cameratose · Posted

      If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...