Jump to content

Soligor 135mm/f2.0 & A7: a couple of portraits


Freyr
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Decided to share some photos I took with my recent purchase - a Soligor 135mm f2.0. If you're looking for an ultra fast, ultra sharp, lightweight and compact tele.. well keep looking. Apart from being an f2, this beast of a lens is heavy (metal and glass only) and quite unwieldy when mounted on my A7. Still, what it lacks in terms of handling and sharpness wide open it more than makes up for with character and build quality, so I absolutely love it.

 

Enjoy  :)

 

27929281404_8984fae479_b.jpg

DSC06209 by Angel Angelov, on Flickr

 

28544908745_2a6abfcf0e_b.jpg

DSC06179e2 by Angel Angelov, on Flickr

 

28515999155_a44ca429da_b.jpg

DSC06160e1 by Angel Angelov, on Flickr

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Soligor 135mm f2.0. If you're looking for an ultra fast, ultra sharp,

lightweight and compact tele.. well keep looking. Apart from being

an f2, this beast of a lens is heavy (metal and glass only) and quite

unwieldy when mounted on my A7. Still, what it lacks in terms of

handling and sharpness wide open it more than makes up for with

character and build quality, so I absolutely love it.

  

By your description, every aspect of it, this would seem to

be nearly the same lens as my Soligor 85/1.5. Very slight

changes to the optical design would shorten a 135/2.0 to

85/1.5, and shortening it would naturally produce the one

stop of extra speed, given the similar sizes of the lenses.

 

Has every aberration you can imagine plus a couple more,

huge build and glass, and a 16-blade iris. It's a T-2 preset

prolly from 1965 +/-. Gets pretty sharp around f/11. Lomo

and LensBaby got NUTHIN on this beastie :-)  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...