Jump to content

Novoflex Adapter Review


Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I just published a review of the Novoflex Canon FD to E-mount adapter. 

I was always curious if the more expensive adapters were worth their price.

So if you have asked yourself the same question check it out to read my answer: Novoflex Adapter Review

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Phillip

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Very good review containing very useful and helpful insights on the differences compared to the cheap ones. I really consider it now, because the FD lenses are among the better ones and it would be nice to use a well made adapter to suit them.

 

Tapatalked with a BlackBerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 Put my new Metabones E to M on my new a7R a couple of days ago and banged off some shots with my Lieca Elmar 135 4, just for fun. I knew that with my Fuji X-E1 and it's Metabones X to M adapter that my Elmar was just past the infinity stop, I assumed it would be the same with the new Metabones adapter, and it was, pretty well exactly.

 

 Impressive, as I realized later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phillip,

 

Thanks for your insight on Novoflex adapters.  I ordered a Novoflex adapter for a Nikon ZF.2 to Sony E mount.  I'm renting a Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 for my Sony a7R.

 

I used a Metabones IV adapter for a Canon EF to Sony E mount .  With this combination I did not get any aperture data and I was unable to adjust my aperture.  I was forced to shot a Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 stopped down to f16.  I understood that the Metabones IV would transmit aperture data and allow adjustment of the aperture with a camera dial.  Am I incorrect?

 

One footnote.  I rented the Metabones IV adapter.  The rental company's shipping documents specified that I was sent a Metabones IV.  But after I was unable to read aperture data or change the aperture, I compared my rented adapter to the images on Metabones' web site.  I concluded that the rental company shipped a Metabones III rather than a Metabones IV.

 

Given the problems that I had using a Canon EF mount on my  Sony a7R, I'm looking at the Nikon F mount offered by Zeiss for the Zeiss Otus 85/1.4.  The Nikon offering from Zeiss has an aperture ring on the lens.  I understand that my aperture reading will not show up in my EVF or as EXIF data, but at least I will be able to adjust the aperture.

 

Your thoughts?

 

Robert Crawford

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I use the Novoflex Adapter MD-NEX to mount Minolta SR-mount lenses on the A7.

 

I agree - it is a simple piece of solid workmanship, infinity being pecisely infinity with all lenses that I use.

 

But it is great only as long as you do not want to attach a tripod directly to the lens, which is definitely recommended for the heavier lenses on the A7.

 

The tripod-mount-accessory that Novoflex sells is expensive, complicated to mount (you have to remove the adapter from the camera, attach the fitting without fixing it, attach the adapter to the camera again, adjust the mount, fix it .....). And once it is mounted, it is totally in the way because you can´t grap the camera properly an longer.

 

It would be much easier to have something more practical like e.g. provided Metabones and others.

 

So if your if applications include heavier lenses without an own tripod mount on tripod, I would not recommend the Novoflex adapter.

 

Having APS-C and planning to use Minolta wide angle lenses, I would consider a ´speedbooster´-adapter, otherwise you can´t really take advantage of those lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Wonderful article. I appreciate the attention to details, including the portion about the reflectiveness of the inner barrel.

 

I was considering between the Novoflex and the Ciecio7 Canon FD to Sony NEX adapter. Both have no moving parts. Went with the Novoflex in the end.

 

Cheers,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...