Jump to content

What A7* recommended for Macro


insectour
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't do a lot of macro, but when I have played with it, I typically crop images in even tighter than what the lens can give me... If you do the same, clearly the A7R or A7Rii will be your best bet.  The ii will not only give you more resolution, but IBIS could also be very helpful.

 

The 90mm is a shockingly sharp piece of glass.  A bit slow to AF sometimes, but incredible detail

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the 90mm for my A7RII. As many have said, very sharp but slower AF than the other sony FE lenses. Low light it really struggled and i usually just switch to MF.

 

As for a body i would personally recommend the A7RII if you have the $ to spend. Had mine for a few weeks and it hasn't disappointed me yet. Next i would say the A7II and finally the A7S. These 3 all offer the silent shutter. The A7II would be good since it too has IBIS, double the MP of the A7S and is the lowest priced of the three. If you need really good low light performance of course that's the A7S's specialty. However for normal city night/indoor low light, unless i found a great deal on an A7S, i'd probably hold off on expanding my lens collection, bite the bullet and throw $800 more for the A7RII. The good low light, huge MP, internal 4K for me are all worth the extra $ vs the other 2 bodies and i'm rarely shooting in such a light less situation that i feel i'd need the A7S sensor. Finally the A7 and A7R are both great cameras but unless you are getting a great used deal on them, you are only saving a couple hundred over what the A7II can be bought for. Tweaks & new features such as the IBIS, better EVF, bigger grip, grip shutter button, extra custom button and a stronger mount on the mark 2 cameras are, for me, well worth it. With that 90mm lens, you will want most of those new features.

 

Best value: A7II, Best Camera: A7RII

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for a body i would personally recommend the A7RII if you have the $ to spend. Had mine for a few weeks and it hasn't disappointed me yet. Next i would say the A7II and finally the A7S. These 3 all offer the silent shutter.

 

Just a small note: the A7 II (unfortunately) does NOT offer a silent shutter, but only EFC. On a practical level, though, in terms of cutting down vibrations they should perform the same.

 

That being said, I use for macro work an A7r (first version) coupled with a 60mm Zeiss Contax Makro-Planar. If you, like I do, shoot from a tripod (or handheld but using flash as your main light source) the results are stunning in terms of detail, shutter slap notwithstanding.

 

On the other hand, should you want to use the camera hand-held in available light (i.e. no flash) than you will surely much better off with one of the A7* with IBIS (although I use sometimes the Contax-A7r combo even hand-held with good results it is not easy or ideal to do so).

Link to post
Share on other sites

macro: you shoot on a tripod, MF, lower ISOs, with flashes on higher shutterspeeds?

 

I would go for the A7R. High MP, great DR, all the great basics of the A series included. Good price.

The advantages of the A7RII to the A7R are non existant under this circumstances. Will be left the 42 (7952 x 5304) vs. 36 (7360 x 4912) MP. And that's not worth the price difference.

A7S has too few MP and high ISO is not the solution in macro.

A7 shines over the A7R in speed and AF. Both not needed in macro and looses on the MP side (which is important in macro)

A7II same as A7 and A7RII arguments.

 

If the other 5% of your shots are your childrens or your wife, you may consider the A7RII. ;)

 

Best value: A7R, Best Camera: A7RII

Link to post
Share on other sites

While waiting for more comments here some more information based on my current equipments (A77, Tamron 180mm, Sony Twin flash)

1. Most of my Macro photography is handheld with flash as main light source.
2. Most of the time I do photography in the field with active arthropods in hot hours or at night.
3. I'm using MF (with peaking) and AF (Center) depending on the situation and the dynamic of the scenes and the size of the objects
4. Typical ISO range 250-400 depend the light condition

you can see some of the photos in my website FB page

https://www.facebook.com/insectour.world/photos_stream


Tks for all the comments and your time

Amir
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you don't need new gear.

 

You haven't mentioned a shortcoming

of your current gear that could be

solved by newer gear.

 

You can increase your MP, plus gain

1/3EV speed/DOF [b'bye semi-mirror]

with new gear, even if you have no

complaints about your current gear.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Sigma 105mm 2.8 macro a-mount lens and ILCE-7 + LAEA-2.

 

The LAEA-2 i still have from my NEX-7 times has a little vignetting on FF but very fast and precise AF, and the OSS works great! Good for handheld portrait shooting.

 

I don´t think i need something better than this.

 

If you are happy with your Tamron than buy a LAEA-4 Lensadapter and Sony A7  (cheap and very good) or A7II..(IBIS) if  24MP is good for you (for me it has plenty resolution).

 

I would not go for the A7R because of the shutter sound/vibration problems. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be even more clear

The camera and the lens are in the end of the life.
No point to fix them as it too expensive and complicated in Israel.
Already fixed A77 in USA (too long and expensive).

Since Sony equipment is expensive in Israel and limited (bad service)
I'll be in the USA in December and this is good opportunity to buy a new set for macro.

Plus, the current set is too heavy (back problems), so this opportunity to reduce weight.

 

Tks
Amir

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 77II is a good camera for macro, it adds magnification in the APS-C crop factor.  Lots of megapixels gives you crop space, but unless you are printing quite LARGE, 20mp is plenty.  If you were keeping the lens I would just get a new a77II.  If you are getting a new lens, with your concern for weight, the A6000 would be ideal.  With the flash, the 5-Axis SteadyShot is of limited help.  If you want to improve your images, try using a tripod (yes,a lot of work) and image stack to increase depth of field. 

 

 

 

Image hand held with ring flash

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...