Jump to content

Getting a Fotga M39-NEX adapter? This is the tool you'll need ...


tetrode
 Share

Recommended Posts

Many LTM lenses work brilliantly with the Sony A7 bodies but a thread mount-to-E mount adapter is required to make the pairing work. In my case, I wanted to use a 75mm f/2.5 Voigtlander Color-Heliar on my A7II body. The adapter I chose, the Fotga M39-NEX, was advertised as being compatible with the A7II so that's what I got.

 

Thread mount adapters are, of course, adjustable so that proper orientation of the lens can be obtained. Which brings me to the point of this post: The Fotga adapter (which mounts beautifully to the A7II) does not come with the tool required to loosen the three adjustment screws nor is there any indication of what tool is needed. This resulted in considerable frustration as none of my jeweler's screwdrivers or tiny Allen keys fit. Querying the seller was fruitless as he didn't know the proper tool either.

 

Anyway, as a public service to spare others the frustration of trying to right an inverted screw mount lens, here's the answer (at least for the Fotga mount):  You'll need a 1.3mm Allen key which you won't find at your local home center. I ordered this Wiha set of micro hex wrenches which I found on ebay:

 

Wiha_Allen_Keys.jpg

 

All lined up:

 

Fotga_M39-NEX_Adapter.jpg

 

and mounted:

 

19483058555_1052096e54_c.jpg

 

Hope this helps someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

............

 

Thread mount adapters are, of course,

adjustable so that proper orientation

of the lens can be obtained.

 

..........

Something is wrong here. There's not any

"of course" about it. Thaz really abnormal.

 

There is no reason to have an orientation

adjustment to align an M39 thread mount,

nor, for that matter, an M42 thread mount.

 

Think about it.

 

The really best advice is not about where

to buy that tool, it's about where to buy a

really PROPER M39 adapter.

 

-------------------------------------

 

T-2 "T-mount" threads always need alignment

but T-2 is not any camera maker's lens mount.

OTOH, M39 and M42 are the Leica and Pentax

screw mounts and these lenses and their body

flanges always start their threads such that

their lenses are already aligned whenever

you mount them onto their matching bodies.

 

`

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

M39 is a thread mount, not a Leica M mount. A Leica M mount is a bayonet and will always have the proper orientation relative to the camera it's mounted on. Orientation of a screw mount lens cannot be guaranteed, hence the need for an adjustable adapter. From an Amazon listing for a screw mount lens adapter:

 

"There are 3 screws that allow you to adjust the orientation of your screw mount lens. The screws hold in place an inner ring that connects directly with the L39/M39 lens; when the screws are loosened this ring rotates "

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

M39 is a thread mount, not a Leica M mount. A Leica M mount is a bayonet and will always have the proper orientation relative to the camera it's mounted on. Orientation of a screw mount lens cannot be guaranteed, hence the need for an adjustable adapter. From an Amazon listing for a screw mount lens adapter:

 

"There are 3 screws that allow you to adjust the orientation of your screw mount lens. The screws hold in place an inner ring that connects directly with the L39/M39 lens; when the screws are loosened this ring rotates "[/size]

As I already explained, that is abnormal.

 

A proper M39 or M42 THREAD mount will

always align properly cuz there's a known

STANDARD for where the thread starting

point is located.

 

For example, if you have an E-mount to

Pentax-K or E-mount to Leica-M adapter

and you put a K-to-M42 ring in the former

or a Leica M-Ring in the latter, there is

no provision for aligning the thread start

position. It will be exactly where it has

always been known to be, cuz there is a

STANDARD for it.

 

The real recommendation is to steer clear

of adapters that don't follow the standard

[iOW adapters requiring alignment]. That

is the public service notice.

 

Jeeeeeez. Lookit. If thread mounts needed

alignment or orientation then the auto-iris

would never have worked in all those SLRs

with M42/Pentax-Practica mounts, and the

rangefinders wouldn't work in M39 bodies.

Think About It.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not want to enter the discussion, but only offer one data point: my Visoflex II which has an M39 to attach to my Leica Ig has five (if I remember correctly) screws that shall be loosened to align the body of the Visoflex to the camera, otherwise - once it is solidly screwed in - it is almost invariably tilted with respect to the camera.

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing strange to this. In fact it is a feature of the adapter thats I actually expect to be present. It is just a matter of being able to rotate the barrel of the lens so that the printed numbers and lines on the barrel appears where you want them since a thread mount never can do this properly in the same manor as a bayonet mount. I have several m39-nex adapters and m39 mount vintage lenses and all mount perfectly due to this feature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got one from Fotasy M42-NEX on Amazon for about $11, and it also has the little screws to orient the lens.  It mounts my Helios 58 f/2 from Dog Schidt Optiks like a charm.  In fact, I may get a couple more M42 lenses when I'm in Russia next month.  

 

The adapter I had for A-mount for this lens (just a little bayonet) didn't allow for adjustment since there was no extra space.  Chalk up one more advantage of FE. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...