Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey I finally went and purchased a Sony A6000, as I caught a good sale on a bundle at sams club got the display camera bundled with 18-55 lens and 55-210 lens for $ 584.00 plus tax. I couldn't pass it up, my plan for camera is to mostly capture sports, those sports being Basketball and Soccer. Occasionally I will also do family photos but mostly for friends. I was wondering if anyone had any settings suggestions I should try or suggestions on lenses/ accessories I should pretty much immediately purchase. Thanks for all suggestions and help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

There are many options and with time you'll find sertings that suit your style of photography.

 

To get started with sports, you could set the camera to S mode and the shutter speed to 1/1000s. Set ISO to auto, focus area to wide, autofocus to AF-C and use the 55-210. This will allow you to track moving people and freeze their movement. If you shoot indoors or outside in low light, you might get grainy photos, but that's because the lens does not allow enough light to hit the sensor. Only a change of lens will fix that.

 

After that, you can start experimenting with lock-on AF to track a certain person and shutter release priority to increase the shutter response. It is entirely possible to shoot sports with this camera and lens but it's not optimal for it. So you can expect to miss shots and you'll need some practice to get the really nice photos you want.

 

Fot portraits you can use either lens. Start by setting the camera to A mode. Select ISO 100 and the lowest F-number you can. Select AF-S and activate face recognition. You need fairly good light, so if the images come out blurry, set ISO to auto. Zoom in a bit, use 55m on the short lens and 100-210 on the long lens.

 

There's a lot more and many variations, but these will get you started.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • In the old film days it made a lot of sense to invest in lenses and film than in the body.  Today, a more balanced approach is needed. Speaking of cheap lenses, what I have often noticed is great sample variability, I have two fairly good SEL 16-50 kit lens that came with my cameras, but I have tested one from a friend that was horrible, completely decentered. 
    • You are correct for the Voigtlanders I own - the aperture ring is mechanical. It tells the camera what the aperture is, but yeah, no control from the camera.
    • When I was shooting film, I used to buy an inexpensive body and pair it with an expensive lens and shoot with pro film. Now I'm doing the opposite.  The body cost so much, I've been trying to get by with inexpensive lenses with predictable results. I've also been buying some inexpensive Chinese made binoculars (actually, almost all binoculars are Chinese made) with pretty impressive performance and was hoping for the same with camera lenses. Seems I'm far more critical of the performance of camera lenses. I just ordered some lens test charts. Amazon.com : DGK Color Tools High Resolution 8.5x11" Chrome SD Professional Lens Test Chart, 3-Pack : Office And School Rulers : Electronics I don't have a really good lens to compare my cheap lenses against, but I can test them against each other and see where I need to do more shopping. There may be a price point where performance is both acceptable and affordable.  I'm hoping.  I'm pretty sure my Samyang 100mm macro lens is pretty good.  My Meike 50mm is pretty questionable.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...