Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A minor niggle, but it is very easy to knock the exp comp wheel by accident when carrying the camera only to find that it has altered without doing so on purpose. It is a shame that there is not a lock on this setting wheel so that it would only adjust when needed. A small point but, I would say a valid one

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really enjoy how easy it is to purposely  change exposure with the dial, particularly while looking through the viewfinder.  However whether changed on purpose or by accident, I have learned to ALWAYS glance at the dial before starting to shoot.  I would rather have it loose than locked in place...just my preference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really enjoy how easy it is to purposely  change exposure with the dial, particularly while looking through the viewfinder.  However whether changed on purpose or by accident, I have learned to ALWAYS glance at the dial before starting to shoot.  I would rather have it loose than locked in place...just my preference.

 

I guess when you come from fairly manual rangefinder film cameras, Leica M6, as I do, there is an awful lot going on with this Sony camera, and so much information available through the viewfinder, and the menus? it is almost, information overload, at present but I appreciate I have a lot to learn, that is, providing this 70 year old head can formulate it all?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old Leica user here as well but i much prefer the aperture compensation dial of my A7s mod to that of my M240 and M8.2 i must say. I feel it less easy to knock off by far and i don't have to use the screen or the viewfinder to check it contrary to Leica's. Works pretty well the same on my Fuji and Panasonic cameras BTW. YMMV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I painted a bold white mark on the dial at +/- 0   

to make it more visually obvious if it's shifted.  

Just one of several white, red and yellow dots 

painted on my gear. It may not be as elegant  

as other solutions, but it beats writing lengthy 

blogs complaining about how gear designers 

are failing to consult me or read my mind ;-) 

  

Not referring to Kenneth, just generalizing ... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...