Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

With an August vacation date you're going to run out of time before you get your answer.

Do you really believe Sony intends to continue with an APS-c line?

They are certainly very cautious about enlarging their Sony E lenses.

On the other hand, they've been pushing out full-frame cameras and FE lenses like pancakes at a church fund-raiser.

Up to a wek ago I would have said the 6xxx lines would fade away but there have  been a series of new discounts to the 6000 and 6300. That's usually a sign of a new model being introduced. And too, it will be a year this October when the 6500 was introduced. October  is also when a  large photo expo will take place.

Bottom line, there's no point to your waiting but there's a chance that a new 6000-series camera and/or lenses will be annunced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspect no new a6x00 anytime soon. With the exception of the a9 the a6500 has most of Sony's newest sensor and processing tech. a7ii line is coming up on 3 years old and is due for a refresh. Signs are for this fall. Expect it will get most of a6500's tech, like 4d focusing and features in ff. FWIW, a6500 makes a7ii feel sort of dated. A9s has been rumored since its release. If that also shows up late this year along with a7iii it is enough for this year without walking on each other.

 

FWIW, I have liked the a6500 very much, so much so my a7ii has not been out if the bag since I got it. I have too many Minolta and Sony A mount lenses so IBIS is what sold the a6500 for me. With focus motor in lens lenses the a6500 and LA-EA3 adapter is just about as fast focusing as with native E lenses. With older screw drive A mount lenses the LA-EA2 works very well, not quite the amazingly quick focus and tracking of native E, but pretty good. Used A mount lenses are dirt cheap these days. They are a lot of capability without breaking the bank on glass. LA-EA3 (abt $150) and a Sigma 18-250mm (another $150) has made a good walk around combination, as does the adapter and a Sony 35mm f1.8 (abt $125) a nice prime on the a6500. Curiously the A mount 35mm f1.8 rates higher and is cheaper than the similar lens in native E. I like the collapsible 16-50mm kit lens, although some people do not. It is very compact and flaws are mostly corrected in camera so you never see them in JPGs if that's what you shoot. Corrections are easy in post with raw. More than you wanted to know, but one inexpensive way to configure an a6500 system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.............    

 

Up to a wek ago I would have said the 6xxx lines would fade

away but there have  been a series of new discounts to the

6000 and 6300. That's usually a sign of a new model being

introduced. ............

    

Yes, things do follow a pattern such as you describe.   

   

Except, IMNSHO, the new 6xxx model is not over the 

horizon ... it's the recently delivered a6500. All other 

Sony models now need to play catch-up to the a6500.  

   

The current discounts are simply typical.  a6000, and

6300, production is surely all finished, and they'll just 

gradually shave the price until inventory is depleted. 

IOW, look to the a7 [original] as a recent example of 

the pattern.  

  

Personally, the a7-II is my 'Goldilocks' camera, and I 

look forward to getting a 2nd body when inventory of 

its generation is cleared out at about $1100 :-) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may both be right. We may know better after October.

But Sony is unpredictable (as in he case of the a6500 pushed out so quickly after the a6300). It's not a  traditional camera manufacturer as  in he case of Canon and Nikon. 

And yes, the a6500 specs are awesome. But the camera can still be  improved. The touch scree LCD is only half as functional as Panasonic's, Canon's, etc. The menu screens are still awkward and there are still functions missing that other cameras have.

And marketing-wise, "new ad Improved" works in everything from automobiles to toothpaste.

In any case I'm delighted what Sony has made available to us photographers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stratis, I pretty much agree, and with your earlier observation that Sony has been pushing ff really hard too. Their recovery strategy from a couple of years ago focused on introducing "disruptive technology" to increase their market share and profitability. They certainly have done that with vigor and success. Nikon is on the ropes and Canon is treading water while Sony is making good money.

 

Most Sony model releases have had a major distinguishing technology feature, for example in the a7ii and a6500 it was IBIS. That makes the next releases likely hinge on dramatic "disruptive technology". A7iii gets that with the a6500 sensor technology in ff, data path and 4D focus tracking. The a6500 likely waits for an update until Sony figures it is time for a9 technology to run downhill when it has dramatic new stuff for the a9. I will bet that every new release will have the new battery out of the a9 and that the other features fall out here and there secondary to dramatic features that mark new model releases.

 

I don't believe Sony will take its foot off the gas while it has its biggest competitors on the run and is changing the technology of photography for fun and profit.

 

Wonderful isn't it? Each new Sony camera brings more delightful features.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

With an August vacation date you're going to run out of time before you get your answer.

Do you really believe Sony intends to continue with an APS-c line?

They are certainly very cautious about enlarging their Sony E lenses.

On the other hand, they've been pushing out full-frame cameras and FE lenses like pancakes at a church fund-raiser.

Up to a wek ago I would have said the 6xxx lines would fade away but there have  been a series of new discounts to the 6000 and 6300. That's usually a sign of a new model being introduced. And too, it will be a year this October when the 6500 was introduced. October  is also when a  large photo expo will take place.

Bottom line, there's no point to your waiting but there's a chance that a new 6000-series camera and/or lenses will be annunced.

 

 

I agree with much of what you stated. I do believe that Sony is committed to the APS-C line without question. Video! They have to be present at that price point below FF. Video though. The a6500 is a really good option for most people shooting video. I am about to dump my a7iii and pickup an a6500 or wait on the next a7s update. Both the a7R and a7ii are ready for retirement. Those cameras don't make any sense in the line up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...